From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F4EC4332F for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230088AbiJESFk (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:05:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41010 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230253AbiJESFR (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:05:17 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC70B1E3EE for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id bh13so15886832pgb.4 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=nIqsN5Y36o9uKB3kQl6IPDAEUpBerFIdsKTeks0pAdU=; b=H2bF2EK8yg7WeUE2VhFxyvdENtn6ogUpwnExVHkBKbgW+Vv62uOoOGr65e1BqssB1r kRRAHA0VFmJIU0K4pBsu5al80IpdNZylULmHFpPMxqI0F8mnGmtAFHwZBH1m8jyex/HE +7mTPVf7KKbGrfIreHgHOVlOkVQNj1OUqVPabHGekgvpdelZjrV5uuW0tqXLS922DJXI CWV46bycVVdmUUaX+ViwoFv+qiA8294hfXsd+KYZxl5l0DfOX4NSP7ufxIj4DaVt+8D4 +lXUsUtmDuQb6RfNOPxjNpSfbONdUkwRftiHxzVHhZkiyB8C7PwnmC4Qwtc5rba2pmBu tzVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nIqsN5Y36o9uKB3kQl6IPDAEUpBerFIdsKTeks0pAdU=; b=KF1Bvy9R3O+rh6L82xk/nX7kKtlwAsFpS0leYzyD7YK9goFgrpzqaQxKucPPNl2dC4 1gFyNR2RmKYoBPeKdXyhBItAAdmwCL6RYruBLKv3IXxC7tgWlCqIcwWunNJ22DBibM+Z gknRubsz9WbOdCkUps8KsVrSpxeVWzxn3Ql6R2lLPs4lcvXZdtrMip8yWCMbSQ/qF/qh u2t1fSONgeGt8oEUis1N0CCvCRhETevJPfPl450wnIdA+53MqQvmNzA6/8SdrAqMuEKk Q1t6WYYcOyKKqCG0bKIv1Yf3oFL2dY9EY8eaG12PO+XJT4VVxz5eocfjCPYwdMuk9onD bhpw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2SQk02fsAwwhb+czkq+EvNQe1mtM/ISPBOyljGLLM350rdGyiS 72sepvIxj1BVNj5hnRKcq4ybUHAeMvU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM74zdr61EBj/05p4lEQqgJAxv/BBhlhw29qOuCEBiFsdvLKYHZWs8NIcD+OPtoUi5I4mw8/Mg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:99f:b0:543:198b:f995 with SMTP id u31-20020a056a00099f00b00543198bf995mr885740pfg.45.1664993110019; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pc14-20020a17090b3b8e00b0020a28156e11sm946pjb.26.2022.10.05.11.05.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Oct 2022 11:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: "Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Hostetler , Eric Sunshine , Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershausen?= , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Ramsay Jones , Johannes Schindelin , Eric DeCosta Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/6] fsmonitor: option to allow fsmonitor to run against network-mounted repos References: Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 11:05:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 04 Oct 2022 17:32:25 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget" writes: > An additional issue is that for mount points in the root directory, FSEvents > does not report a path that matches the worktree directory due to the > introduction of 'synthetic firmlinks'. fsmonitor must map the FSEvents paths > to the worktree directory by interrogating the root filesystem for synthetic > firmlinks and using that information to translate the path. > > v15 differs from v14: > > * fix memory leak Thanks. I thought "what, another iteration? didn't we see this enough times already?" and a note like this does help reminding reviewers why we need one. Very much appreciated.