From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF19C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E3C23AFE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729317AbgLHVOW (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:14:22 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:50927 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726114AbgLHVOV (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:14:21 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01B41083C9; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:13:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=p3pEuanyUU1na+z6dUlTJ9A05Fo=; b=hf/+6n 1HmCu1NjU71GV9nK26jZsWCBjPGCzkrrUFvDokAb2KX8VeDfigXPt0tHLCDsXeWh X7HvdzwpdGuqJuixuXU7evgXF1fb6PN7nBcc7b5zxo78eZy6lO8HuImOsGl6oaPD Ka8an1JoadDxQlVNtSq9eTsa40dw3QD+ZBWLI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Hs0otHM690B1bL8vETlVkbhbbNWvbaJb E+XB6d5CMrY5PzbD0DljbMFFpqtc8AvaDjNlpQvQJmHOvU3rm1SFfTeBQB44zUo5 rL9FEHM1gDiUSzo/t4CNGV2BJlHbJHyRkdP0bKQCb6DdYPpxaQesAtTtpWqhxYP/ fM/sENuYr5E= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C855E1083C8; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:13:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B15C1083C7; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:13:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] t5310: stop expecting the default branch name `master` References: Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 13:13:35 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:00:35 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3CB60E5C-399A-11EB-AA2F-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:35:48AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" >> writes: >> >> > This one goes on top of tb/pack-bitmap, and requires an update of >> > js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch (it no longer needs to >> > hard-code GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME in t5310). >> >> As the targetted topic is not in 'next' and marked with "Needs a bit >> of reshuffling?", I'd appreciate this patch to be also forwarded so >> that I do not have to worry about it myself. > > Ah, sorry that I missed this before sending out v3. I was hoping that > the fixup would be limited to one patch, but this needs to be either > spread across multiple patches, or applied at the end. > > Since I already sent v3, how do you want to handle this? As I have many other topics on the table to attend to, I can skip v3 and take v4 if it is not too much trouble to fix the issue at the source. Thanks.