From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch>,
l.s.r@web.de, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] t4018: an infrastructure to test hunk headers
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:36:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq38i8so4y.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532D3411.2000109@kdbg.org> (Johannes Sixt's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 07:56:17 +0100")
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
> I see what you mean. Notice, however, that we also test whether
> the regular expressions can be compiled successfully, and for this
> it is desirable to have the complete list of userdiff drivers.
> Until we have at least one test-case for each driver, we wouldn't
> get the complete list.
I missed the fact that we lack "here is a pair of test files in this
lang $p; go find diff between them and make sure we have the right
hunk header" for many $p.
So the kind of improvements I wondered about are allowed to come
later, but shouldn't be done in this series, especiallly not at this
step in the series.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-23 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 0:36 [RFC/PATCH] diff: simplify cpp funcname regex Jeff King
2014-03-05 7:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2014-03-06 21:28 ` Jeff King
2014-03-07 7:23 ` Johannes Sixt
2014-03-14 3:54 ` Jeff King
2014-03-14 6:56 ` Johannes Sixt
2014-03-18 5:24 ` Jeff King
2014-03-18 8:02 ` Johannes Sixt
2014-03-18 11:00 ` René Scharfe
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 00/10] userdiff: cpp pattern simplification and test framework Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 01/10] userdiff: support C++ ->* and .* operators in the word regexp Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 02/10] userdiff: support unsigned and long long suffixes of integer constants Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 03/10] t4018: an infrastructure to test hunk headers Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-22 6:56 ` Johannes Sixt
2014-03-23 19:36 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-03-24 21:36 ` Jeff King
2014-03-24 21:39 ` Jeff King
2014-03-25 20:07 ` Johannes Sixt
2014-03-25 21:42 ` Jeff King
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 04/10] t4018: convert perl pattern tests to the new infrastructure Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 05/10] t4018: convert java pattern test " Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 06/10] t4018: convert custom " Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 07/10] t4018: reduce test files for pattern compilation tests Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 08/10] t4018: test cases for the built-in cpp pattern Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 09/10] t4018: test cases showing that the cpp pattern misses many anchor points Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 10/10] userdiff: have 'cpp' hunk header pattern catch more C++ " Johannes Sixt
2014-03-21 22:25 ` [PATCH 00/10] userdiff: cpp pattern simplification and test framework Junio C Hamano
2014-03-24 21:49 ` Jeff King
2014-03-05 20:31 ` [RFC/PATCH] diff: simplify cpp funcname regex Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq38i8so4y.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=drafnel@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=tr@thomasrast.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).