From: Junio C Hamano <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Derrick Stolee <email@example.com>
Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
Derrick Stolee <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Derrick Stolee <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] csum-file: flush less often
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:52:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:46:20 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> So, I'm of two minds here:
>> 1. This is embarassing. I wasted everyone's time for nothing. I can retract
>> this patch.
>> 2. This is embarassing. I overstated the problem here. But we might be able
>> to eke out a tiny performance boost here.
>> I'm open to either. I think we should default to dropping this patch unless
>> someone thinks the rewrite above is a better organization of the logic. (I
>> can then send a v2 including that version and an updated commit message.)
> 3. The current code around "if (nr == sizeof(f->buffer))" might be a
> bit too clever for readers who try to understand what is going
> on, and the whole "while" loop may deserve a comment based on
> what you wrote before your replacement implementation.
Having said all that, comparing the original and the version updated
with your "flush less often" patch, I find the latter quite easier
to read, so as long as the update does not give us 1% slowdown, it
may be worth adopting for the readability improvement alone.
Of course, if we were to go that route, the sales pitch in the log
message needs to be updated.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-24 17:50 [PATCH] csum-file: flush less often Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-03-25 11:55 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-03-25 18:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-25 18:52 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-03-26 3:16 ` Jeff King
2021-03-26 12:38 ` [PATCH v2] csum-file: make hashwrite() more readable Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-03-26 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-28 8:38 ` Jeff King
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).