git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>, Seth House <seth@eseth.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] mergetool: add automerge configuration
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:32:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4kka3ke8.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fe4baed206cc_19c9208e8@natae.notmuch> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Thu, 24 Dec 2020 09:59:41 -0600")

Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> >> Yup, I already mentioned UI mistake so you do not have to repeat
>> >
>> > You said it was a UI mistake, not me. I am a different mind than yours.
>> 
>> Yes, but the point is that I do not need to nor particularly want to
>> hear your opinion on the behaviour of "git merge-file".
>
>> I know (and others reading the thread on the list also know) that the
>> exit code of the command is misdesigned already.
>
> Unless you can read minds, you don't know that.

Actually I do, because they heard from me already ;-).  If this were
the case where our messages crossed, perhaps, but in this case yours
was a response to my message.

>> Again, please realize that on list discussion is a team effort to
>> come up together a better design of a shared solution.
>
> Which is why agreement in a team with different minds and different
> viewpoints is important.

It is not like opinions on all points are important.  Whether the
exit code from merge-file is or is not a UI mistake does NOT have
any influence on what we were discussing.  My opinion is that exit
code from merge-file is a UI mistake, but even if you disagree with
that, that would not change the conclusion we already reached that
the code should ignore its exit status, like you originally wrote.

I am already trying to ignore your opinions on things that do not
matter in the context of this project, as you told me earlier ;-)
But just like patches, messages are written only once but read by
many people, so I'd always aim for reducing noise at the source.

Anyway, happy holidays and pleasant new year to you and to
everybody.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-24 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-23  4:53 [PATCH v5 0/1] mergetool: remove unconflicted lines Felipe Contreras
2020-12-23  4:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] mergetool: add automerge configuration Felipe Contreras
2020-12-23 13:34   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-23 14:23     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-23 20:21       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-24  0:14         ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-24  0:32           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-24  1:36             ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-24  6:17               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-24 15:59                 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-24 22:32                   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-12-27 18:01                     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-24  9:24 ` [PATCH v5 0/1] mergetool: remove unconflicted lines Junio C Hamano
2020-12-24 16:16   ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-30  5:47   ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-12-30 22:33     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-27 20:58 ` [PATCH v6 0/1] mergetool: add automerge configuration Seth House
2020-12-27 20:58   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] " Seth House
2020-12-27 22:06     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-27 22:29       ` Seth House
2020-12-27 22:59         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-27 20:58   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] mergetool: Add per-tool support for the autoMerge flag Seth House
2020-12-27 22:31     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-28  0:41   ` [PATCH v7 0/2] mergetool: add automerge configuration Seth House
2020-12-28  0:41     ` [PATCH v7 1/2] " Seth House
2020-12-28  0:41     ` [PATCH v7 2/2] mergetool: Add per-tool support for the autoMerge flag Seth House
2020-12-28  1:18       ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-28  4:54     ` [PATCH v8 0/4] mergetool: add automerge configuration Seth House
2020-12-28  4:54       ` [PATCH v8 1/4] " Seth House
2020-12-28 11:30         ` Johannes Sixt
2020-12-28  4:54       ` [PATCH v8 2/4] mergetool: Add per-tool support for the autoMerge flag Seth House
2020-12-28 13:09         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-28  4:54       ` [PATCH v8 3/4] mergetool: Break setup_tool out into separate initialization function Seth House
2020-12-28 11:48         ` Johannes Sixt
2020-12-28  4:54       ` [PATCH v8 4/4] mergetool: Add automerge_enabled tool-specific override function Seth House
2020-12-28 11:57         ` Johannes Sixt
2020-12-28 13:19         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-28 19:29       ` [PATCH v9 0/5] mergetool: add automerge configuration Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 1/5] " Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 2/5] mergetool: alphabetize the mergetool config docs Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 3/5] mergetool: add per-tool support for the autoMerge flag Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 4/5] mergetool: break setup_tool out into separate initialization function Seth House
2020-12-29  8:50           ` Johannes Sixt
2020-12-29 17:23             ` Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 5/5] mergetool: add automerge_enabled tool-specific override function Seth House
2020-12-29  2:01           ` Felipe Contreras
2021-01-06  5:55           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-07  3:58             ` Seth House
2021-01-07  6:38               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-07  9:27                 ` Seth House
2021-01-07 21:26                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-08 15:04                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-30  5:46         ` [PATCH v10 0/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration (was automerge) Seth House
2021-01-30  5:46           ` [PATCH v10 1/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration Seth House
2021-01-30  8:08             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-30  5:46           ` [PATCH v10 2/3] mergetool: break setup_tool out into separate initialization function Seth House
2021-01-30  5:46           ` [PATCH v10 3/3] mergetool: add per-tool support and overrides for the hideResolved flag Seth House
2021-01-30  8:08             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-09 20:07           ` [PATCH v11 0/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration (was automerge) Seth House
2021-02-09 20:07             ` [PATCH v11 1/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration Seth House
2021-03-09  2:29               ` [PATCH] mergetool: do not enable hideResolved by default Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-09  5:42                 ` Seth House
2021-03-10  1:23                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-10  8:06                 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-11  1:57                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-12 23:12                     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-12 23:29                       ` Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-12 23:36                         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-13  8:36                           ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-13  8:38                             ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-13  8:41                             ` [PATCH 2/2] doc: describe mergetool configuration in git-mergetool(1) Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-13 23:34                               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-13 23:37                               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-09 20:07             ` [PATCH v11 2/3] mergetool: break setup_tool out into separate initialization function Seth House
2021-02-09 20:07             ` [PATCH v11 3/3] mergetool: add per-tool support and overrides for the hideResolved flag Seth House
2021-02-09 22:11             ` [PATCH v11 0/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration (was automerge) Junio C Hamano
2021-02-09 23:27               ` Seth House
2020-12-28 10:29     ` [PATCH v7 0/2] mergetool: add automerge configuration Junio C Hamano
2020-12-28 14:40       ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-28  1:02   ` [PATCH v6 0/1] " Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq4kka3ke8.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=davvid@gmail.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=seth@eseth.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] mergetool: add automerge configuration' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).