From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDA6C32771 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED63C214AF for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="cVyNV6mR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729187AbgAOSei (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:34:38 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:51544 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729039AbgAOSei (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:34:38 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF63A93C46; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:34:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=id66k2kkwKcCLXKszHpG3DQSqhs=; b=cVyNV6 mRyKpWBlcU9gtYc00iajvgYL4YF67xLm9HY4gaoWq2DLqmFzrUSwzTU4VptM54Eo 8oP3NkuxEFW9V3FODXBpK6t4VF5v+vzbIEGuuOKW12gP3EEZxRwamVLfY4njJkvY Whcgn0o6vxyinwYQEbB0ZEOZZ1pIVY7t8Q61w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=OJjC/gn95P5NoUYR/uWsl779wT0nwdgf uNyyoO1KfCLfpMYFZ2E7OTPJm4YpOinD483nYNOcLP3X/Z5cBfx8kH1o2AaYKdoe aeE2lk6IEQv3aT40LrorSbT0rIomSpJwpfnXcOyztPOsEsbHYNWQJ0uSxYTsCMdW EwN4FP2fFPI= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D857093C45; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:34:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E3DB93C44; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:34:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Denton Liu Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.25.0 References: <20200114024938.GA17003@generichostname> <20200115154239.GA40131@generichostname> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:34:30 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200115154239.GA40131@generichostname> (Denton Liu's message of "Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:42:39 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AC85981A-37C5-11EA-8379-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Denton Liu writes: > Since 'next' is getting rewound in a little bit, can we requeue Stolee's > patch with the authorship corrected? Or would it make more sense to > submit a .mailmap patch on top? The former. Thanks.