From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC45C2B9F8 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7263E61413 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232547AbhEYT36 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 15:29:58 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:55478 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231722AbhEYT35 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 15:29:57 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD7B12F0C3; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:28:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=l1y+qeABF+AR UtUDj11/3mwEFp/RYX0Iv1tQ0tMkN8M=; b=k5eEqu6W8DkTyicJ8INGWcFJYeg2 ZHXr/UTbGU88MKQJnvMADpuUpF+5/Hh9amLZ0+tP0OT4bHu/lYDLoORMZfXzwz9F ymCONO5MwZzdniqJb3SwDsn7jf2HnSs438mFoqHzzG+vwwvjMbIfouzy5UodnUy0 4jwJaIDLEDxmJeM= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F3B12F0C2; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:28:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.73.10.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E098512F0BF; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:28:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt , Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Nieder , Robert Foss Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] send-email: don't needlessly abs_path() the core.hooksPath References: <874kerny0e.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <87v977m2q6.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 04:28:23 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87v977m2q6.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Tue, 25 May 2021 14:09:35 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5FC05CF8-BD8F-11EB-A2ED-D5C30F5B5667-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > But I'll leave it to you, if you are convinced and do want to take this > 2/2 after all I'll submit another trivial patch on top to remove the ne= w > (then unused) repo_path function, which we expect to go away anyway. Sounds good.