From: Junio C Hamano <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Jonathan Nieder <email@example.com>
Cc: "Jeff King" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
"Felipe Contreras" <email@example.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: explain the use of color.pager
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 15:36:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKVsw3uqb66ifzvd@google.com> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Wed, 19 May 2021 12:53:39 -0700")
Jonathan Nieder <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> The current documentation for color.pager is technically correct, but
>> slightly misleading and doesn't really clarify the purpose of the
>> variable. As explained in the original thread which added it:
>> the point is deal with pagers that don't understand colors.
> Missing "to" before "deal".
Will locally amend.
> More importantly, I think I'd find a
> reference to the commit or a quotation from the affected user more
> helpful than a reference to the mailing list archive, since that would
> make this a bit more self-contained.
The original commit and its log message we ended up with did not
explain the motivation behind well enough.
The motivation from the original thread:
When I use a pager that escapes the escape character or highlights the
content itself the output of git diff without the pager should have
colors but not with the pager. For example using git diff with a
pathspec is quite short most of the time. For git diff I have to
enable paging manually and run git diff | $PAGER usually but git log
uses the pager automatically and should not use colors with it.
can be quoted as a whole, but "the point is to deal with ..." is a
succinct summary that is good enough for the purpose of this commit,
I would think.
>> + A boolean to specify whether `auto` color modes should colorize
>> + output going to the pager. Defaults to true; set this to false
>> + if your pager does not understand ANSI color codes.
> I quite like the "set this to false if your pager does not understand
> ANSI color codes" part --- short and to the point.
> The sentence before takes me long enough to understand that I don't
> think we've gotten the wording right yet. Before I suggest some
> wording, let's make sure I understand the behavior correctly:
> - unlike other color.* settings, this can only be "true" or "false".
> It cannot be "auto".
> - in other color.* settings, "auto" means "colors are used only when
> stderr goes to a terminal". A pager typically ultimately writes to
> a terminal, but (1) it's not guaranteed to (e.g., xless writes to
> its own window instead) and (2) more importantly for us, it's not
> guaranteed to write terminal escapes as is.
Correct---color.pager is about telling Git about the pager's capability.
> - so this setting can be used to answer "for the sake of evaluating
> color settings, should we treat output that is going to a pager as
> going to a terminal?"
I am not sure if that is the easiest-to-explain way to view it.
It's more like "color.diff says 'auto', so we'd color it when the
output is going to tty and the terminal is not dumb. We'd also
color it when our output is not directly going to tty (because we
are writing to a pipe whose other end is being read by the pager)
but we know we are talking to a pager, BUT the pager may not be able
to handle coloured output correctly---so we need a way to say "no,
even though our output goes to the pager, we cannot colour the
> If I understood correctly, how about some text like the following?
> A boolean to specify whether `auto` color modes should colorize
> output going to a pager, in addition to their behavior of
> colorizing output going to a terminal. Defaults to true; [etc]
The variable has no control over what happens to output that
directly goes to a terminal, so while the additional phrase might
not be technically wrong per-se, I do not see why this is more clear
than the original.
So, in short, I think it would be sufficient to amend the proposed
log message with s/deal with/to deal with/ and nothing else.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-19 9:17 [PATCH] doc: explain the use of color.pager Jeff King
2021-05-19 10:41 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-19 19:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2021-05-19 20:39 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-19 22:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-20 6:36 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-05-20 8:33 ` Jeff King
2021-05-20 15:05 ` Jonathan Nieder
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).