From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0870C43331 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360292080C for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="HFUP7tnj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728435AbgDCRfs (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:35:48 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54514 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728329AbgDCRfs (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:35:48 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D93E4A2B2; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:35:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=kQMNzl8aQrCr4UqmMAAalJ/pC9g=; b=HFUP7t njmL2fmSvh7OFhfQDrfD1TJ6s5g8PWYhpIN+DNSfNyFis48TxxGLCMrxt2aaZ8Wm l3H7NCv+9MnVaMSBAkbhllpz77sTIP54y0teLR3Jos4SyyNuwBQ7/tPCuoh0kQsb gxblRpAUNRLAh8TEsfITvVfAGDWJL45NgFV/s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Ax+Av0lyp7t1UxO5Gv5zgZ4L7Jqa4wHg g2oUieIC9KK8KNgOpohLc/ai4/0b1ZhU6ukUp41QMVqF9Uo8SLA1Yt3+FUi1uL7r fWnQZb7CG8daLcL4KxgnUIK9O5z3ceI+HfFlmehUo7Vao+VataI8wLpiSYhfGCwe 1/dPMIuE2Oc= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AF44A2B1; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:35:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A801C4A2B0; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:35:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , git , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] update-ref: implement interactive transaction handling References: <5670bea2b15bafbd93d7d507b35e54980ad06fb9.1585811014.git.ps@pks.im> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:35:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:33:58 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8CADA51A-75D1-11EA-A7FA-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > ... but I am not so sure about the actual > implementation in this topic ... I take this part back---given that this is merely building on top of the existing atomic update, we should be OK.