From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Cornelius Weig <cornelius.weig@tngtech.com>
Cc: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>,
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen@googlemail.com,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:43:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq60l01jr9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60e9abdf-cc37-33d8-e7eb-8a3370ffe1cc@tngtech.com> (Cornelius Weig's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:49:26 +0100")
Cornelius Weig <cornelius.weig@tngtech.com> writes:
> -Do not PGP sign your patch, -at least for now-. Most likely, your (...)
> +Do not PGP sign your patch. Most likely, your maintainer or other (...)
It has been quite a while since we wrote that "at least for now", so
it probably makes sense to drop it.
>> Maybe even s/by signing off/by adding your Signed-off-by:/ to be sure
>> that the reader knows that it is _their certification_ that is being
>> sought. Even if it does double up on the 'your'.
>
> I don't think doubling on the 'your' will make the heading clearer. The
> main intention of this change is to avoid mixups with pgp-signing and
> that would IMHO not improve by that.
> Besides, I find the colon in the heading a bit awkward. Is the following
> version as expressive as with the colon?
>
> -(5) Sign your work
> +(5) Certify your work by adding Signed-off-by
I am leaning towards agreeing with Philip, and my gut feeling says
the presense of the colon, would help a lot. It would visually
click to readers what we are talking about.
At the same time, I think ending a section header with a colon would
be seen as "awkward". I would have written it more like this to
avoid it:
... by adding "Signed-off-by: " line
I personally do not mind having "your" there, either, but I can see
that a section header wants to be kept shorter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-27 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-22 22:57 [PATCH 0/7] completion bash: add more options and commands bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen
2017-01-22 22:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] completion: teach options to submodule subcommands bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen
2017-01-22 22:57 ` [PATCH 2/7] completion: add subcommand completion for rerere bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen
2017-02-02 0:57 ` SZEDER Gábor
2017-02-02 9:16 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-01-22 22:57 ` [PATCH 3/7] completion: improve bash completion for git-add bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen
2017-01-22 22:57 ` [PATCH 4/7] completion: teach ls-remote to complete options bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen
2017-02-02 1:40 ` SZEDER Gábor
2017-02-02 9:40 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-02-02 16:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-22 22:57 ` [PATCH 5/7] completion: teach replace " bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen
2017-01-22 22:57 ` [PATCH 6/7] completion: teach remote subcommands option completion bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen
2017-02-02 1:37 ` SZEDER Gábor
2017-02-02 10:29 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-01-22 22:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] completion: recognize more long-options bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen
2017-01-24 7:15 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-01-24 8:14 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-01-24 23:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-24 23:33 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-01-24 23:43 ` Stefan Beller
2017-01-25 0:11 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-01-25 0:21 ` Stefan Beller
2017-01-25 0:43 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-01-25 0:52 ` Re: Stefan Beller
2017-01-25 0:54 ` Re: Linus Torvalds
2017-01-25 1:32 ` Re: Eric Wong
2017-01-25 6:54 ` SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing Philip Oakley
2017-01-25 22:38 ` Stefan Beller
2017-01-26 13:30 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-01-26 17:57 ` Stefan Beller
2017-01-26 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-26 20:58 ` Philip Oakley
2017-01-27 10:49 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-01-27 17:43 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-01-27 21:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] completion: recognize more long-options cornelius.weig
2017-01-27 21:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] " cornelius.weig
2017-01-31 22:17 ` SZEDER Gábor
2017-02-01 16:49 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-02-02 2:00 ` SZEDER Gábor
2017-02-02 10:40 ` Cornelius Weig
2017-01-31 22:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] completion: improve bash completion for git-add SZEDER Gábor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq60l01jr9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen@googlemail.com \
--cc=cornelius.weig@tngtech.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.org \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).