From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D242018E for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752168AbcHHSIj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:08:39 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51240 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752054AbcHHSIi (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:08:38 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F8633C8C; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:08:37 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=c4AQYRC4LcwdA4pqYhORUZaqfVQ=; b=vI1tLy cpfpO25vVTwslifgrQl8oDDK7w8+D7c/LHZuy8Eds0ct3+y+wYmDzooxQ6YNXK5b i9m2RAV+ka2mEdZCeQQ3NWHwUwnJ611lEQwK35WghePk9GxzDC3pJw413Ap3vekR SoktaQHmka9qxfYDXQgYVwe7nVEJka73V+qzc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=eYJKEYJ9VbGUeh6X7CO/OeXJ8LPRehYo 8wkJjQwqUtK2NeAooh1gJ+DWIU+GeIxBjY35tNdhIAhDvF+XxwDiqmAxLjKVRgkm 1oP1nBzo9ZNalH7G6vQyfFSyZySCjaHv6IcYoswNeWmNrEA7DRl/9RzH9RT2Jsm1 r0sDE2cKzEw= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA6533C8B; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:08:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93C5A33C89; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:08:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Kirill Smelkov Cc: Jeff King , Vicent Marti , =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A9rome?= Perrin , Isabelle Vallet , Kazuhiko Shiozaki , Julien Muchembled , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pack-objects: Teach it to use reachability bitmap index when generating non-stdout pack too References: <20160729074051.GA5987@teco.navytux.spb.ru> <20160729074746.31862-1-kirr@nexedi.com> <20160808135600.c6hdlqwwtqe7thd5@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160808154054.GB3995@teco.navytux.spb.ru> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 11:08:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160808154054.GB3995@teco.navytux.spb.ru> (Kirill Smelkov's message of "Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:40:54 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 206A9606-5D93-11E6-A237-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Kirill Smelkov writes: > Thanks for the info. I did not knew about show-index when I was starting > to work on this and later it just came out of sight. Please find > corrected patch below. > > ---- 8< ---- > From: Kirill Smelkov > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:47:46 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH v5] pack-objects: Teach it to use reachability bitmap index when > generating non-stdout pack too Please don't do this (not the patch text itself, but saying "Please find ..." and attaching the patch AFTER 60+ lines of response). When going through old/read messages to see if there are patches that fell through the cracks, if it is not immediately clear in the top part of the message that it contains an updated patch, such a patch will certainly be missed. Please say "I'll follow up with a corrected patch" instead of "Please find ..." and respond to that message with just the patch.