git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Long Teng <dyroneteng@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] packfile-uri.txt: fix blobPackfileUri description
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 08:32:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7dk3edfh.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADMgQSQfvacwfnhz=taR5904AJp=CWgiq50+5F0A=hN4jGo9pg@mail.gmail.com> (Long Teng's message of "Wed, 12 May 2021 22:10:29 +0800")

Long Teng <dyroneteng@gmail.com> writes:

>>It seems that the above needs a bit more polishing?
>>
>>I am not sure if moving the sign-off higher and inserting a
>>three-dash line before "Jonathan Tan writes" would be sufficient,
>>but with everything under that quoted material does not seem to
>>belong to a proposed commit log message proper.
>
> Sorry, I misunderstood.
>
> I looked at some patches in the community. If I reply to the
> reviewer’s suggestion separately and then submit a new patch, is it
> the recommended way? (Distinguish between the ‘reply‘ and the
> 'patch').

Yes.  Some people seem to omit the final response to reviewer
suggestions on the previous round and just send a revised patch, but
it is much nicer to cleanly conclude the review cycle for the
previous round with a separate response (it could just be "yes,
you're right---I'll incorporate your suggestions in the next round,
thanks") before starting a new cycle.

And the "patch" side should be written to be understandable even by
those who do not have access to the review history of the previous
round(s)---imagine how it appears in "git log" output to those who
did not read the discussion on this mailing list, and write for
them.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06  7:33 [PATCH] Optimize the description of the configuration in packfile-uris doc Teng Long
2021-05-06 16:47 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-05-06 21:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11  6:45     ` [PATCH v2] packfile-uri.txt: fix blobPackfileUri description Teng Long
2021-05-11 20:50       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-12 14:10         ` Long Teng
2021-05-12 23:32           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-05-13  7:15 ` Teng Long
2021-05-13 21:33   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-18  0:44     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-24 15:43       ` Jonathan Tan
2021-05-25  0:34         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-13  6:44 [PATCH v2] " Teng Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq7dk3edfh.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dyroneteng@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2] packfile-uri.txt: fix blobPackfileUri description' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).