From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B92C07E9C for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6830261CC3 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230396AbhGGUrA (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:47:00 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:52645 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229519AbhGGUq7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:46:59 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05261352E6; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:44:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=PJi7501TsYlNBtFZZ1ubh9CCOWxOrb4JmJZjeV BCkxw=; b=Mnfg0K6m2Cm/R/0yF4K3KFwop4otBX7/UxcsJWXmLdaEbPUZb8LUnG 3fRBfxggJxyQEIlPhxSay8iUXPkQNiqlSmc+eR9Jjz2RuWJCvJQjUXk9CEcg3aDa +RmsnN5IOh6zsfIW69dESNJK68J4DtslUym4Z2GwjPZooYGeMJ+D4= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985A31352E5; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:44:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.3.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C07D1352E1; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:44:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Han-Wen Nienhuys , Jonathan Tan , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Han-Wen Nienhuys Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] refs: cleanup errno sideband ref related functions References: Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 13:44:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 07 Jul 2021 19:07:43 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 183CEDE6-DF64-11EB-876C-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget" writes: > Han-Wen Nienhuys (6): > refs: remove EINVAL errno output from specification of read_raw_ref_fn > refs/files-backend: stop setting errno from lock_ref_oid_basic > refs: make errno output explicit for read_raw_ref_fn > refs: add failure_errno to refs_read_raw_ref() signature > refs: explicitly return failure_errno from parse_loose_ref_contents > refs: make errno output explicit for refs_resolve_ref_unsafe Thanks, incremental changes look sensible. Will requeue.