From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055B6C35247 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 21:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A552166E for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 21:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="M2sUdoAJ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727586AbgBDVot (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 16:44:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:62407 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727441AbgBDVot (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 16:44:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F3052F86; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 16:44:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=MPnW4ga0WjP6OIZBZ8FoFXma+5Q=; b=M2sUdo AJ7F56lduHKzbw68lcPOtCqVepnuxn6N4Q7nIxW0fBNrfU8xChau2Ya26ucVFeTY j7Mhw9kuI01HL59TsKJaHisbeu71uRnAsZRV2ZpBTc8kAEiJqgGY3QWOqf44RN0Y TTdrp9ZK2mDlELU2SjqvYPAQ9fhRiIrVIIWBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wpn0CF3VThigQ2DSw+9cASEaclWEXsWs UfA1YbYyGGAnMcgRwoVAqJAMMgC4JGAJF1rSkUsR7KcsXYvAQPT8EswcKWtvkjt9 KlBjAYM9yWP1fsZCX3cPQqRgtxzJP7tFFs/YqpbAFGVcdVreNu4oGrW0+Y+WMQE4 iTsetqXGrJo= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE1552F85; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 16:44:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B25EF52F84; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 16:44:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, dstolee@microsoft.com, martin.agren@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] commit-graph.h: store an odb in 'struct write_commit_graph_context' References: <5d3819180dbc9bc33a8fe4354e2320f497151fb4.1580795403.git.me@ttaylorr.com> <20200204212833.GA42626@syl.local> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:44:45 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200204212833.GA42626@syl.local> (Taylor Blau's message of "Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:28:33 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8FDD717E-4797-11EA-B0A6-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 11:54:58AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Taylor Blau writes: >> >> > Whoops. In v2, this patch introduces 'find_odb()' as a function in >> > 'builtin/commit-graph.c', but does not declare it static. This causes >> > breakage in gcc with '-Wmissing-prototypes'. Here is a correct version >> > of the patch that does not cause such breakage. >> > >> > -- 8< -- >> > >> > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] commit-graph.h: store an odb in 'struct >> >> What happened to the rest of the line ;-)? > > Heh. Your email made me chuckle since this wasn't the first time I've > been asked about this today ;-). I manually yanked the 'Subject:' line, > but not the continuation below it. > > I'd be happy to re-send a version of this patch to fix this, but if you > don't mind slicing it up, that works too. > > Thanks, > Taylor Noneedtoresend. Thanks.