From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977F2C5479D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 04:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236670AbjAIEgE (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:36:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41498 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234276AbjAIEfe (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:35:34 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB2BAF001 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:30:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id c85so1973217pfc.8 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2023 20:30:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=hmiJAq6BBb5sICA/eesx9ULpcfElj+7mNufySzJ/Pjk=; b=ls/cqb0UbldAZzuFafp2jTGCtDjKIsKCc3VnI5jf3+6O/z2oR8+AGkiPaMTtQ0Urkp uXKInRMatYAYP5YXP9pxSwnDVftXCz4h8zocyQx8bLyqr67+wiC42s7RjJOREcGvEjnw EP7MV2ukxVvuXVLG0KapMzjMUl1n4asVe4HQW1UOVZSaDoqCQfKtEyCL3ThyLmUm9/UY RQmrobU1Wozo9B4LkRcdl5/Ea0wzX7KSgaBvmrMw5E7dAR5MLYfawj28I6Ec3SYcGJJn OAQJ0lNPidly4SccdjzGGN6QbJ4tvNYTM8IkENqqKj6qWlaXU5hnrleHCiQ0edAsJnj8 MiTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hmiJAq6BBb5sICA/eesx9ULpcfElj+7mNufySzJ/Pjk=; b=cop4qscT5IuDFQVN0K3Iv1eSAF6MG9HMGjXfl5lCbSmPnezQ553FDszUQZnrbn0cX1 L+svHAw5Rt3ns4vWzyqW0muo3nG4Qgdg4OokJxM81gopT7IcVs8BC48ToIlFUY0lXHID lo8jFjOMNytzf9lx8NB72Q9HZ4F5cFRYhn3yRg9DOKobxBwM9Uwt8q95hoFFZG3Oq5Iw FwKFzZQuAwHFHwheeqSd3A92Q/qyi/t1VJXCkzV9mzfziUfYmUQ+64bwPfrdtTvQMoK4 pWt8KHnm7nouMe2Rx79hc4IXYpMX87CfgY8iCIuGB/1MK1QW5F0Q4CAF5kvqC/MYt8/l E69Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krO19dIV4j0reG1TycM8orGKkoXQri9XKNlEXvSEBzgJxYIHktl oTkwq6xVbt1O6hVi1dpP210Y662KkhiRSw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuk0KoodY4TAtvR/VYZkTKBN7QtY0dIUwtucyMc9hy9W5KSsLdZz+y3u8i+tYMqqbRNX3r29g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:26e8:b0:583:3d0a:4c34 with SMTP id p40-20020a056a0026e800b005833d0a4c34mr10389932pfw.4.1673238656836; Sun, 08 Jan 2023 20:30:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s64-20020a625e43000000b0056da63c8515sm4878417pfb.91.2023.01.08.20.30.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 08 Jan 2023 20:30:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: "Yutaro Ohno via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Yutaro Ohno Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: use "git switch -c" rather than "git checkout -b" consistently References: Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 13:30:55 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Yutaro Ohno via GitGitGadget's message of "Sun, 08 Jan 2023 08:24:01 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Yutaro Ohno via GitGitGadget" writes: > From: Yutaro Ohno > Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: use "git switch -c" rather than "git checkout -b" consistently Hmph. When two things work equally well, is it a good idea to describe only one "consistently", or mention both that can be used pretty much interchangeably in different places? I am not 100% sure "consistently" is a good thing here. Thoughts from others?