From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362C6C433DF for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 21:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E477205ED for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 21:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="t96aquwp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728673AbgEMVV1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2020 17:21:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:62462 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726550AbgEMVV0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2020 17:21:26 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413A56424B; Wed, 13 May 2020 17:21:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ohUtQcgg/MENORkPHobdgPcZ1pk=; b=t96aqu wp8Fj4pAXaokF4dABytgTVKvWDveKiuoMeTpSMeOdJX9lhcdF7KYWJAdfLCFCPxW RKwYBofgN7b/5a1sLfyWwQd+vnAaU03jE55GQNgYQK9AqKXLo1rV7z0zO/KrG11r UI86t4aEYdjTB6vwNHYj+9wMeWklNJmtYgCxM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=CcX2kTbyQxxfy98/H9SKfpByyXCDZMIP j+n2bzVVGC8LVH+trujSlWsEg9jk9nH90ItbBdGkd9N3HzClBuqL7VNtBYgD+gqZ oMIxIrBRi2BPMAAS3ZjQpfwHeU7YPyvjA2e0XnByFKsZuqzwEyxFr5hNJpeJCCa3 wFdMPvfkoqQ= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384386424A; Wed, 13 May 2020 17:21:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95C4664249; Wed, 13 May 2020 17:21:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Han-Wen Nienhuys Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget , git , Han-Wen Nienhuys , Jeff King , Jonathan Nieder , "brian m. carlson" , Johannes Schindelin , Michael Haggerty , Patrick Steinhardt Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/13] Reftable support git-core References: Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:21:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Tue, 12 May 2020 09:49:28 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B1D6D912-955F-11EA-97CC-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:42 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> As I already said earlier today [*1*], I think some parts of the >> series can be reviewed before the "dense code" part, so let's draw >> the line between patch 8 and 9 (or patch 7 and 8) and try to see if >> we can get the parts before the line reviewed adequately and merge >> them to at lesat 'next' during this cycle, which will close in 3 >> weeks. > > I concocted 7 (write pseudorefs) yesterday in an hour or so. It looks > like it passes tests, but I think it could do with more scrutiny. I > propose to merge 1-6, and leave 7-8 until I figure out how pseudorefs > and worktree refs really work. OK. Today's pushout has the boundary at that spot between 6 and 7.