From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C481C282DD for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0769720842 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="lS7UinaI" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728492AbgAJTg5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:36:57 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:56134 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727709AbgAJTg5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:36:57 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425744292F; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:36:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=nGfPZSbJ5QDulnmuR3/BKL/gxGM=; b=lS7Uin aItoSqDCHBwKV51u8RbO5mXgFt+EYNhGtQULo/3aqZ/5efwYsLXi52+7HZb+Vn/h 6tl+StJ4DG0j/E2jvQfExu71LbwcrR+4s9CmreUrISA0FVbp5r5DVa8D7MgRJer4 cDokTDNGyBHR1Idna4GuVYVlJmN/m7Qc4exwU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RB9d+2PaHTpJ0fFW6hm7FWOlzOt/H1sP QcmZ2ci1wRLkNbIFNK9hK+51OC802dWECxLUt09q+U3upeA2M5LkE1pdNQKYDavu EqUBO89h5LlmD6Tj1rIa9NlKQtTFgCippX6njjVw2jG826i0FpABXo1FWc78ZGrI o262oegGd90= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E034292E; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:36:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D44D4292D; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:36:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Carlo Wood Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: git submodule update strange output behavior. References: <20200109192040.46aaa01e@hikaru> <20200110101251.3b9f9332@hikaru> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:36:54 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200110101251.3b9f9332@hikaru> (Carlo Wood's message of "Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:12:51 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8EEFA720-33E0-11EA-8544-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Carlo Wood writes: > It seems to me that the other part of the problem is printing > this output for submodules when nothing (needed to be) is fetched. Hmm, I am not sure if that is a reasonable expectation. Would it be possible to tell if there is something that needs to be fetched without attempting to contact the other side?