From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036FAC2B9F4 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 03:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F49613BF for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 03:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229868AbhFODIc (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:08:32 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:61252 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229809AbhFODIb (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:08:31 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C03913BCFF; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:06:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Pn1FB/DnBKuU MIVyIHFWvE2w7Qf9yV7B7jw0b2h0gdE=; b=TkNoAWK1H2BorZKiSizBsunf+PfN nkGJB0p86eBQMC878t+dI3oL/k67O5Vidntqt9X+RSi3Yh5lvFwg8jE/kyN+S9VZ yPPtQCY1sJSVmf/VMoODvXNqLMfqRRTTT+GKazpe5/dnuM6YF1r9CbRwQmy+2RZa FGsGjRB5LFtZu2Q= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355B613BCFE; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:06:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.36.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DB0713BCFD; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:06:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Olga Telezhnaya , Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mktag tests: test more exhaustively References: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:06:23 +0900 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyCUFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:28:17 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: ABB95B62-CD86-11EB-AB89-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > ... But now that the dust has settled I figured I'd submit this > test-only series which stresses mktag, fsck and various commands that > might deal with the broken objects the mktag tests creates. Thanks for not forgetting ;-)