From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Aaron Lipman <alipman88@gmail.com>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] t3201: test multiple branch filter combinations
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:07:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqd02oktq8.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAPig+cRrgC5vz9S1qDpEjoEvniBLCbuWt=bkpa2fj=suUm3Bog@mail.gmail.com
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> A few comments:
>
> I didn't examine it too closely, so this may be a silly question, but
> is there a reason to start from scratch (by deleting all the branches)
> rather than simply using or extending the existing branches like the
> other tests do?
>
> If it really does make sense to start from scratch (ignoring the
> existing branches), then an alternative would be to create a new
> repository and run the tests in that repository instead. Whether or
> not doing so makes sense in this case is a judgment call. For
> instance:
>
> test_create_repo features
> (
> cd features
> ...setup stuff...
> )
Good comments; I agree with both.
> It's a bit concerning to see output from porcelain git-branch being
> fed to 'grep' and 'xargs'. More typically, you would instead rely upon
> the (stable) output of a plumbing command. For instance:
>
> git for-each-ref --format="%(refname:short)" refs/heads/ | ...
>
> In new test code, normally avoid having a Git command upstream of a
> pipe since its exit code will be lost. Thus, you might instead write:
>
> git for-each-ref ... >heads &&
> grep -v master heads | xargs git branch -D &&
Again, good recommendation.
Thank you always for helpful reviews.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-08 15:37 [PATCH] ref-filter: allow merged and no-merged filters Aaron Lipman
2020-09-08 22:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-08 23:57 ` Aaron Lipman
2020-09-09 0:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-11 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] git branch: allow combining " Aaron Lipman
2020-09-11 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t3201: test multiple branch filter combinations Aaron Lipman
2020-09-11 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ref-filter: allow merged and no-merged filters Aaron Lipman
2020-09-11 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] git branch: allow combining " Aaron Lipman
2020-09-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] t3201: test multiple branch filter combinations Aaron Lipman
2020-09-13 20:58 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-09-14 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-09-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Doc: cover multiple contains/no-contains filters Aaron Lipman
2020-09-13 21:10 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-09-14 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ref-filter: allow merged and no-merged filters Aaron Lipman
2020-09-13 21:36 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-09-13 21:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-13 22:31 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-09-16 2:08 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] git branch: allow combining " Aaron Lipman
2020-09-16 2:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] t3201: test multiple branch filter combinations Aaron Lipman
2020-09-16 2:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] Doc: cover multiple contains/no-contains filters Aaron Lipman
2020-09-16 19:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-16 2:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ref-filter: allow merged and no-merged filters Aaron Lipman
2020-09-16 4:53 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] git branch: allow combining " Junio C Hamano
2020-09-16 5:08 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-09-18 0:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] ref-filter: merged & no-merged touch-ups Aaron Lipman
2020-09-18 0:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] ref-filter: refactor do_merge_filter() Aaron Lipman
2020-09-18 5:03 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-09-18 5:04 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-09-18 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-18 0:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] Doc: prefer more specific file name Aaron Lipman
2020-09-18 2:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] ref-filter: merged & no-merged touch-ups Eric Sunshine
2020-09-18 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 " Aaron Lipman
2020-09-18 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ref-filter: make internal reachable-filter API more precise Aaron Lipman
2020-09-18 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Doc: prefer more specific file name Aaron Lipman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqd02oktq8.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=alipman88@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).