From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] status: mention --skip for revert and cherry-pick
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:56:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqef162rx2.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be64ce1e92c60f9587b137d36e98532604d4a1ff.1566880835.git.liu.denton@gmail.com> (Denton Liu's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:45:41 -0400")
Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> writes:
> When reverting or cherry-picking, one of the options we can pass the
> sequencer is `--skip`. However, unlike rebasing, `--skip` is not
> mentioned as a possible option in the status message. Mention it so that
> users are more aware of their options.
Is this a good thing, though?
Giving up (because you do not have enough time or concentration to
finish the cherry-pick or revert in progress) with --abort, and
committing to the resolution after spending effort to deal with a
conflicted cherry-pick or revert with --continue, are both sensible
actions after seeing the command stop due to conflicts. Is "--skip"
a recommendable action in the same way? Doesn't a multi-commit
series often break if you drop just one in the middle, especially
if the series is sensibly structured as a logical progression?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-27 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-24 9:04 [PATCH 0/2] completion: complete --skip for cherry-pick and revert Denton Liu
2019-08-24 9:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] completion: merge options " Denton Liu
2019-08-26 16:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-24 9:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] completion: add --skip " Denton Liu
2019-08-27 4:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] advertise --skip for cherry-pick and revert better Denton Liu
2019-08-27 4:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] completion: merge options for cherry-pick and revert Denton Liu
2019-08-27 4:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] completion: add --skip " Denton Liu
2019-08-27 4:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] status: mention --skip for revert and cherry-pick Denton Liu
2019-08-27 21:56 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-08-27 23:18 ` Denton Liu
2019-08-28 2:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-28 6:45 ` Denton Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqef162rx2.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liu.denton@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).