From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Chris Mason" <clm@fb.com>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enable core.fsyncObjectFiles by default
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 14:27:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqefmknp3f.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180120221445.GA4451@thunk.org> (Theodore Ts'o's message of "Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:14:45 -0500")
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> writes:
> .... I've never been fond of the "git repack -A" behavior
> where it can generate huge numbers of loose files. I'd much prefer it
> if the other objects ended up in a separate pack file, and then some
> other provision made for nuking that pack file some time later....
Yes, a "cruft pack" that holds unreachable object has been discussed
a few times recently on list, and I do agree that it is a desirable
thing to have in the longer run.
What's tricky is to devise a way to allow us to salvage objects that
are placed in a cruft pack because they are accessed recently,
proving themselves to be no longer crufts. It could be that a good
way to resurrect them is to explode them to loose form when they are
accessed out of a cruft pack. We need to worry about interactions
with read-only users if we go that route, but with the current
"explode unreachable to loose, touch their mtime when they are
accessed" scheme ends up ignoring accesses from read-only users that
cannot update mtime, so it might not be too bad.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-20 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 18:48 [PATCH] enable core.fsyncObjectFiles by default Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-17 19:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-01-17 19:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-17 20:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-01-17 19:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-17 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-17 21:44 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-17 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-17 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-17 23:16 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-17 23:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-17 23:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-17 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-18 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-19 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-01-20 22:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-20 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2018-01-22 15:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-22 18:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-23 0:47 ` Jeff King
2018-01-23 5:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-23 16:17 ` Jeff King
2018-01-23 0:25 ` Jeff King
2018-01-21 21:32 ` Chris Mason
2020-09-17 11:06 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 11:28 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] should core.fsyncObjectFiles fsync the dir entry + docs Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 11:28 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] sha1-file: fsync() loose dir entry when core.fsyncObjectFiles Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 13:16 ` Jeff King
2020-09-17 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 14:55 ` Jeff King
2020-09-17 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 15:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-17 17:12 ` Jeff King
2020-09-17 20:37 ` Taylor Blau
2020-09-22 10:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 20:21 ` Johannes Sixt
2020-09-22 8:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-11-19 11:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-09-17 11:28 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] core.fsyncObjectFiles: make the docs less flippant Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 15:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-17 20:15 ` Johannes Sixt
2020-10-08 8:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-10-08 15:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-10-08 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-09 10:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-09-17 19:21 ` Marc Branchaud
2020-09-17 14:14 ` [PATCH] enable core.fsyncObjectFiles by default Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 15:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-01-17 20:55 ` Jeff King
2018-01-17 21:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-23 21:57 [PATCH] Enable " Stefan Beller
2015-06-23 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-23 23:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-24 5:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-24 14:30 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-24 1:07 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-24 3:37 ` Jeff King
2015-06-24 5:20 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqefmknp3f.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).