From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F89C43331 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8399820721 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="ab9g5o5T" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389070AbgDBS0O (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:26:14 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54440 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732330AbgDBS0O (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:26:14 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454BC40450; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:26:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=CZ86EqeaAhT7MiAaFpLQoEDUJqA=; b=ab9g5o 5T8kVRrZQButPd1QCjM6Qow9D5xJUMQLePzJuTesDM3aRjllvpNFqjkhRIdvwx5X 5xofTtb32SRJy91/uvupxtRZ5ncfzhQrLUCNRmgdX0InX4EJA6Mdml9HKSbxCaQ3 QosSW6mC6KS1XOjLr/4Ff0nCwuuFB1I2wY7jA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qIiCQBIOxbpKHo/cMJx08+lqWClGEZq7 qNJBsUveVAwb+8bHpeo+ZxmWaQGWWaJDZI5nmjaAd0L1Se6aYpNO3pofiRx6NbPA qA2ZXcSWA+qTzl0cZyxyfNEv/wcWkprjAWBM239Wt8kg/8tZ4oO/gLAU3Hy6qEyn EqwgV446lMM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C23A4044F; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:26:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBCB34044E; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:26:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jiang Xin , Jonathan Nieder Cc: Git List , Jiang Xin Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] New proc-receive hook for centralized workflow References: <20200304113312.34229-1-zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> <20200402163520.1338-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:26:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200402163520.1338-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com> (Jiang Xin's message of "Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:35:13 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6E8C063E-750F-11EA-8B91-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jiang Xin writes: > From: Jiang Xin > > ## Changes since v5 > > + Fixed code review issues on v5. > > * s/cannot to/cannot/ > > * s/FLEX_ALLOC_MEM/FLEX_ALLOC_STR/ OK > * Add flag `C_LOCALE_OUTPUT` on test cases which may break > gettext-poison test. We prefer to avoid the C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prerequiste when we can use test_i18n to make the poison test not care. If it is too hard to arrange in these tests, it is OK to omit, though. > * Note: `rp_errors()` in "receive-pack" is executed on the > server side, I think leave them unmarked for i18n is better. Hmph, I vaguely recall saying something similar and then got a disagreement from somebody. Perhaps Jonathan (cc'ed)? Thanks.