From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF2DC433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE52264E54 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234399AbhBJAr2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:47:28 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52532 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234402AbhBJApP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:45:15 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBC7B232E; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:44:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=HsMpRjRBnXQ2WlQiohMHPQNBwbM=; b=rLunnG oFgnhOzMfvqxiWqlKGCSbMHzypYC48EydMst0x5CegRvdK9R15sXUrS4w0vaB8eA DfMaEflqwrUYHMwD+Qaxr6iJ2lEpQ+xuQHmsvFUK15P9N2oUnua3t+eBP/0KP6QN DeDlea1Hx5LcE4v7RFJFLWa5paf4/EsasrK1I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mLw+WIkpkYAYD4JH63LKL4utC0uLu2Eu f6cIEOb1OLari4xpYnhaDhR2XE6yuAMRoNyDuM30Z4ZvCjcSTgzRriF3B9K19t7U pXXmG3gDBQvP72CVRnC6EtTicXNmL1adRvTIodZCi1MTet3hW33ERPd6nND6U7u/ Qjw59P8N47I= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042FFB232D; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:44:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52E53B232C; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:44:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Meyer , Eric Sunshine , Taylor Blau Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rev-list --disk-usage References: Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:44:27 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 9 Feb 2021 05:52:28 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2175FA64-6B39-11EB-9DA5-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Here's a re-roll of my series to add "rev-list --disk-usage", for > counting up object storage used for various slices of history. > ... > t/t6114-rev-list-du.sh | 51 +++++++++++++++++++ > t/test-lib-functions.sh | 9 +++- > 7 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 t/t6114-rev-list-du.sh I relocated 6114 to 6115 to avoid tests sharing the same number. I am getting these numbers from random ranges I am interested in, but do they say what I think they mean? Was the development effort went into the v2.28 release almost half the size of v2.29, and have we already done about the same amont of work for this cycle? : gitster git.git/seen; rungit seen rev-list --disk-usage master..next 83105 : gitster git.git/seen; rungit seen rev-list --disk-usage v2.30.0..master 183463 : gitster git.git/seen; rungit seen rev-list --disk-usage v2.29.0..v2.30.0 231640 : gitster git.git/seen; rungit seen rev-list --disk-usage v2.28.0..v2.29.0 334355 : gitster git.git/seen; rungit seen rev-list --disk-usage v2.27.0..v2.28.0 182298