From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AF820C3A for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751994AbdLHSXT (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:23:19 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:55295 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750910AbdLHSXT (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:23:19 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A499FD265A; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:23:18 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Jdv0RURGxlW56EAkYXXgm9iRdXk=; b=wue6mf gzaRPbkfBNSEWey9GMyCZnKkYlKI0XfzY8RF1dJlrucYcss/gHPw7LXhJoYPL9n0 jStZstePldhxMjxH+0Va9acKB/PnscMrTIHY8q8dfx4tAxmSi169lExAp2M5Rqwe KRIZ386T47wi3qBR7xamaaYPTjtdCjeqwRRZA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=aqaIMj9/5fzjtF6lQaWy7F9ZcKL5vHXs 2raEeRvKCzY07eZplV/NQLGwpAqDucd2gq51wYY4ADl3amwywGYvcNyXOXvM3sjz l220GVTu9uxSuLugBlS7++ExJru/aSKvwCEvHG0rxsLDQRBOJOKXlZT1LVOdZHZ9 Ire3v28N8gI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3B2D2659; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:23:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10DCAD2658; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:23:17 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff Hostetler Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, jonathantanmy@google.com, Jeff Hostetler Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] Parial clone part 3: clone, fetch, fetch-pack, upload-pack, and tests References: <20171208155851.855-1-git@jeffhostetler.com> <67f80ac5-6530-094f-bd10-01ef8b5a6b97@jeffhostetler.com> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:23:16 -0800 In-Reply-To: <67f80ac5-6530-094f-bd10-01ef8b5a6b97@jeffhostetler.com> (Jeff Hostetler's message of "Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:10:39 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DCF25882-DC44-11E7-B5B2-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff Hostetler writes: > On 12/8/2017 12:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Jeff Hostetler writes: >> >>> From: Jeff Hostetler >>> >>> This is V7 of part 3 of partial clone. It builds upon V7 of part 2 >>> (which builds upon V6 of part 1). >> >> Aren't the three patches at the bottom sort-of duplicate from the >> part 2 series? >> > > oops. yes, you're right. it looks like i selected pc*6*_p2..pc7_p3 > rather than pc*7*_p2..pc7_p3. sorry for the typo. > > and since the only changes in p2 were to squash those 2 commits near > the tip of p2, only those 3 commits changed SHAs in v7 over v6. > > so, please disregard the duplicates. > > would you like me to send a corrected V8 for p3 ? Nah. I just wanted to make sure that I am discarding the right ones (i.e. 1-3/16 of partial-clone, not 8-10/10 of fsck-promisors). Thanks for an update.