git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, markbt@efaref.net,
	benpeart@microsoft.com, jonathantanmy@google.com,
	Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] pack-objects: add --partial-by-size=n --partial-special
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:47:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh93338s2.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488994685-37403-3-git-send-email-jeffhost@microsoft.com> (Jeff Hostetler's message of "Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:37:57 +0000")

Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com> writes:

> From: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
>
> Teach pack-objects to omit blobs from the generated packfile.
>
> When the --partial-by-size=n[kmg] argument is used, only blobs
> smaller than the requested size are included.  When n is zero,
> no blobs are included.

Does this interact with a more traditional way of feeding output of
an external "rev-list --objects" to pack-objects via its standard
input, and if so, should it (and if not, shouldn't it)?  

It is perfectly OK if the answer is "this applies only to the case
where we generate the list of objects with internal traversal." but
that needs to be documented and discussed in the proposed log
message.

> When the --partial-special argument is used, git special files,
> such as ".gitattributes" and ".gitignores" are included.

And not ."gitmodules"?  

What happens when we later add ".gitsomethingelse"?

Do we have to worry about the case where the set of git "special
files" (can we have a better name for them please, by the way?)
understood by the sending side and the receiving end is different?

I have a feeling that a mode that makes anything whose name begins
with ".git" excempt from the size based cutoff may generally be
easier to handle.

I am not sure how "back-filling" of a resulting narrow clone would
safely be done and how this impacts "git fsck" at this point, but if
they are solved within this effort, that would be a very welcome
change.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-08 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-08 17:37 [PATCH 00/10] RFC Partial Clone and Fetch Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 01/10] pack-objects: eat CR in addition to LF after fgets Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:01   ` Jeff King
2017-03-09 15:46     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 02/10] pack-objects: add --partial-by-size=n --partial-special Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 18:47   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-03-08 20:21     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:04       ` Jeff King
2017-03-10 17:58         ` Brandon Williams
2017-03-10 18:03           ` Jeff King
2017-03-10 19:38             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-10 19:47               ` Jeff King
2017-03-09  7:31   ` Jeff King
2017-03-09 18:26     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 03/10] pack-objects: test for --partial-by-size --partial-special Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:35   ` Jeff King
2017-03-09 18:11   ` Johannes Sixt
2017-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 04/10] upload-pack: add partial (sparse) fetch Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:48   ` Jeff King
2017-03-09 18:34     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09 19:09       ` Jeff King
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] fetch-pack: add partial-by-size and partial-special Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] rev-list: add --allow-partial option to relax connectivity checks Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 18:55   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-08 20:10     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:56       ` Jeff King
2017-03-09 18:38         ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] index-pack: add --allow-partial option to relax blob existence checks Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] fetch: add partial-by-size and partial-special arguments Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] clone: " Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] ls-partial: created command to list missing blobs Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 18:50 [PATCH 00/10] RFC Partial Clone and Fetch git
2017-03-08 18:50 ` [PATCH 02/10] pack-objects: add --partial-by-size=n --partial-special git

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh93338s2.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=benpeart@microsoft.com \
    --cc=git@jeffhostetler.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=markbt@efaref.net \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).