From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFCAC64E7B for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA77221F7 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728785AbgLBWgA (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:36:00 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:61099 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728458AbgLBWf7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:35:59 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C76FE790; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:35:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=g1jC2NdGEaX1Z60FG3XjGPPA3s8=; b=o9sZwC jMDKEKYimADTgHZCh9BqprjsF2L9IHzEBpfXHW/SzjvntBfyV36lZO8PfJlc5RaI z2QtAl4rNt3YPHKUxdsIGnRwefTcCYbiog2BYL2K5sHPaR9wgV/e/vAdT757u2xj FShevEi4zvEXyCQ08XcOSrEwNStxqdtcaq7a8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KTii7hXGqOZnSo0qFeqwvW3TuFtHHkYm zL4+vy09HjVp25YM/Q+AIi1817MFL9U6KIgRoxY2IqBMO/8B/SFi7Y0cONNwnKrs 0Wq9q60OvMa1RkghHMDaZIsIEjbgJ9oesx5ufevAYkmBpIMOU33PxeLsUPb//gpV 1zxVzXvctI4= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92EBFE78F; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:35:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0600DFE78E; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:35:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Todd Zullinger Cc: "brian m. carlson" , Arnout Engelen , git@vger.kernel.org, Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= , Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: make HTML manual reproducible References: <20201201095037.20715-1-arnout@bzzt.net> <20201201154115.GP748@pobox.com> <20201202160755.GX748@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 14:35:13 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20201202160755.GX748@pobox.com> (Todd Zullinger's message of "Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:07:55 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A59E6FD2-34EE-11EB-AB96-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Todd Zullinger writes: > brian m. carlson wrote: > ... >> I don't think that's necessarily the case. I just tested using a random >> name with another DocBook project I have and it seems to work fine, so >> there shouldn't be a problem with specifying a name undefined in the >> stylesheet using xsltproc. > > Oh, that's very good to know. Thanks for testing the fine > details. I checked that works on a CentOS 6 system where > the docbook-xsl version is 1.75.2, to test whether an older > docbook-xsl is similarly forgiving of unknown --param's. That is very good, indeed.