From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8CAC433DB for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 01:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9704664E8E for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 01:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232290AbhBMBxz (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:53:55 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54042 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232298AbhBMBxy (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:53:54 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CB2B672F; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:53:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=WS0rquxLHDpwEYMVjbClLI5fJj4=; b=ZSwm9K P+pFkx7M5gc9t4YoNpXjBO2QWCpXitTceb5syOhfftiBNZau0oHwqINHGrSaEDGD XUN8ojjq5miM1XfDItPFHU1okrXyhmgb9r9VIkU10M5VMPm5sOMX35fD5JIkORKa GyYagJ6XAdOF5SraQDe4OezxdCAKmfTp53JNE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qZ2eveKyMIptd3jOrqT1y7ByTodn9fu4 3GqjZgkO9j38jzR0i+X97YgrHJ4bmZuOeJPiu3MFVQINUFepRz7IvE28Lye+Bszr LGxbCefFiecyTFx0aMVzfmAptuEelcfFEc4we5h7MTuAtla+BGT+v4c38yQhuWFQ EUhH2e9dD/s= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD226B672E; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:53:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.243.138.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 035EAB672D; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:53:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , Jonathan Tan , Taylor Blau , Jeff King , Elijah Newren , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Optimization batch 7: use file basenames to guide rename detection References: Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:53:10 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:15:43 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3A00DDDA-6D9E-11EB-A6DC-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" writes: > This series depends on ort-perf-batch-6[1]. > > This series uses file basenames (portion of the path after final '/', > including extension) in a basic fashion to guide rename detection. > > Changes since v3: > > * update documentation as suggested by Junio > * NEW: add another patch at the end, to simplify patch series that will be > submitted later (please review!) Sorry, by mistake I somehow read v4 and sent some comments on v3, but as the above says, they are on the part that hadn't changed at all, and should still be relevant. Thanks.