From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894B2C433E1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D95E20639 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="bcz+v2lc" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726826AbgHXRzM (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:55:12 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58973 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725601AbgHXRzL (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:55:11 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F2776824; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:55:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=u0C8l29YAyeDgBO1aoSs5gvKnNA=; b=bcz+v2 lcjLkPK4TrBSv+oNsH5jtL4ljUopFbAGaJiV6oLQPfci5VnLXeqV+oydm9usiN6R nN4ctAy3NkrLsI0gql68y5oVJabzHu/MY/keBIgrroMYUh+jWPNUlDJYp37A/5Vx oSQCHy3XNDV+PPfXO8hL7uxPQZmiTEauB0YCk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Vy6O5E6Sjs/2oJYrqD3af0qNsAJK+BLa CsbQJbBA2bOx0qiKLb6HXUbgA5UMiCGQNYUYFtkE4r3IUcxAS7NMbUeja9HNuuJZ r79y7ioIGmZHZZx746cuvD9D+uOasvMxjnihMq0HHc7RQ40D6xS6vbNOR9b1x0wm uS4abXeXnIg= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440E176822; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:55:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21C0476812; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:55:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Jacob Keller , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Jacob Keller Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] refspec: add support for negative refspecs References: <20200821215247.758978-1-jacob.e.keller@intel.com> <20200821215247.758978-2-jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:55:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:29:49 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F2C07B1C-E632-11EA-964B-2F5D23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > The `?:` operator is not supported e.g. by Visual C. Let's not use it. Thanks. IIRC that was GNU extension?