From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B53C001B0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229629AbjHJQE3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:04:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54800 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233517AbjHJQD5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:03:57 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A91C2D4F for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541D719A290; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:03:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mM5ldpctVltxnF7OvR0mfQxk9J1dFlbEi7kG5F tWAIs=; b=OtRFp8KD/avMGY4RFUPRNpqD93Dl9zr6OB3BMDNhxgiWps0gX5ph0e uZ3w/EkAFEB/LcitTukZjbTNxqiyQffkmlB74EBpY8Jjz4p7RXsajXRdXPc8QZ7v 4ZD68/6J1HSzCEixGE2gIgjXYzgibHSYJkBdeS23spE/UL9O6hwSA= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C5119A28F; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:03:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.168.215.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 988B519A28E; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:03:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Oswald Buddenhagen Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Taylor Blau , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rebase: clarify conditionals in todo_list_to_strbuf() References: <20230428125601.1719750-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <20230807170935.2336745-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:03:54 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Oswald Buddenhagen's message of "Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:08:44 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 820A668A-3797-11EE-A626-C65BE52EC81B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Oswald Buddenhagen writes: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 12:39:37PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>Thanks. Then this patch is still a strict "Meh" to me. >> > i can't really think of a reason why you reject such a no-brainer > other than that you consider it churn. in that case i need to tell you > that you have unreasonable standards, which actively contribute to the > code remaining a mess. An ad-hominem remark is a signal that it is good time to disengage. There are certain style differences that may be acceptable if it were written from the get-go, but it is not worth the patch churn to switch once it is in the tree. This one squarely falls into that category. Bye.