From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A106C00A89 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AB02075E for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="XV11U1l0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726095AbgJ3RG4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:06:56 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51467 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725808AbgJ3RG4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:06:56 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8838552F; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:06:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=brwLlg1u0yFWyfgCAUu/dvhn0ns=; b=XV11U1 l0PbiGM+GFQfuK4k6OYTQ5dnF/h+cXIT54CGcRWv/C85IR0mXUdv1sN1/IDbSf9D MpcCS7ianxXfh3Cs5nw6sKDpbFK9cg0lgENV48nTNRGfDisxslDnjhCp7kJ0LJ+2 sgykhUsdmtyZ2ktST24T6DfH4Fd3W6y10OiTk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=WFpZz5iLk6OK/v3Jyj3qPWAaEUBRYiRP 0QdVUyV2K9lZylM12yQB83p8LSgl/e7NQIibtYgogR5862VUOTANuTpDnwrWoKCe i3uWmwBlVGZqGz5hvcMUhxpMnka0KYsh67PLF02AOSJH2zdvdkpAox4OcZvgROZA y5EZZg8umyI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0662D8552E; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:06:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82E2D8552D; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:06:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] t5411: start using the default branch name "main" References: Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:06:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:04:19 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4EFC0C38-1AD2-11EB-A48B-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > Do you mean that this patch, squashed into 1/4: > ... > would be much more understandable? Yes, that was what I meant. We could have a "test_skip='under construction'" without any PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH in 1/4 and then replace that with the endgame state you already had in 4/4, alternatively, which might already be enough explanation for a short transition period that lasts just few patches ;-). > If so, I agree, and I will gladly send off the next iteration with that > change. > > If I misunderstood, can I please ask you to give it another try to explain > it to me? No, you understood what I meant perfectly. Thanks.