git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	Seth House <seth@eseth.com>,
	Dana Dahlstrom <dahlstrom@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mergetool: do not enable hideResolved by default
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:06:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmtvbjuvl.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEbdj27CmjNKSWf4@google.com> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Mon, 8 Mar 2021 18:29:35 -0800")

Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:

> diff --git a/git-mergetool.sh b/git-mergetool.sh
> index 911470a5b2..f751d9cfe2 100755
> --- a/git-mergetool.sh
> +++ b/git-mergetool.sh
> @@ -358,13 +358,8 @@ merge_file () {
>  		    enabled=false
>  		fi
>  	else
> -		# The user does not have a preference. Ask the tool.
> -		if hide_resolved_enabled
> -		then
> -		    enabled=true
> -		else
> -		    enabled=false
> -		fi
> +		# The user does not have a preference. Default to disabled.
> +		enabled=false

OK.  So the logic used to be

 - If the user has preference for a specific backend, use it;

 - If the user says the feature is unwanted, that is final;

 - If the user says it generally is OK to use the feature, let each
   backend set the preference;

 - If there is no preference, let each backend set the preference.

As we want to disable the feature for any backend when the user does
not explicitly say the feature is wanted (either in general, or for
a specific backend), the change in the above hunk is exactly want we
want to see.

Looking good.  Let's not revert the series and disable by default.

Should I expect an updated log message, though?  What was in the
proposed log message sounded more unsubstantiated complaint than
giving readable reasons why the feature is unwanted, but both the
response by Seth and your response to Seth's response had material
that made it more convincing why we would want to disable this by
default, e.g. "with little to no explanation", "We don't have a way
to communicate to the end-user" (both by Seth), "when ... didn't end
up lining up the files correctly", "no way to visually distinguish"
(yours) are all good ingredients to explain why this feature is
prone to subtly and silently give wrong information to the
end-users.

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-10  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-23  4:53 [PATCH v5 0/1] mergetool: remove unconflicted lines Felipe Contreras
2020-12-23  4:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] mergetool: add automerge configuration Felipe Contreras
2020-12-23 13:34   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-23 14:23     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-23 20:21       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-24  0:14         ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-24  0:32           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-24  1:36             ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-24  6:17               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-24 15:59                 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-24 22:32                   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-27 18:01                     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-24  9:24 ` [PATCH v5 0/1] mergetool: remove unconflicted lines Junio C Hamano
2020-12-24 16:16   ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-30  5:47   ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-12-30 22:33     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-27 20:58 ` [PATCH v6 0/1] mergetool: add automerge configuration Seth House
2020-12-27 20:58   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] " Seth House
2020-12-27 22:06     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-27 22:29       ` Seth House
2020-12-27 22:59         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-27 20:58   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] mergetool: Add per-tool support for the autoMerge flag Seth House
2020-12-27 22:31     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-28  0:41   ` [PATCH v7 0/2] mergetool: add automerge configuration Seth House
2020-12-28  0:41     ` [PATCH v7 1/2] " Seth House
2020-12-28  0:41     ` [PATCH v7 2/2] mergetool: Add per-tool support for the autoMerge flag Seth House
2020-12-28  1:18       ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-28  4:54     ` [PATCH v8 0/4] mergetool: add automerge configuration Seth House
2020-12-28  4:54       ` [PATCH v8 1/4] " Seth House
2020-12-28 11:30         ` Johannes Sixt
2020-12-28  4:54       ` [PATCH v8 2/4] mergetool: Add per-tool support for the autoMerge flag Seth House
2020-12-28 13:09         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-28  4:54       ` [PATCH v8 3/4] mergetool: Break setup_tool out into separate initialization function Seth House
2020-12-28 11:48         ` Johannes Sixt
2020-12-28  4:54       ` [PATCH v8 4/4] mergetool: Add automerge_enabled tool-specific override function Seth House
2020-12-28 11:57         ` Johannes Sixt
2020-12-28 13:19         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-28 19:29       ` [PATCH v9 0/5] mergetool: add automerge configuration Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 1/5] " Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 2/5] mergetool: alphabetize the mergetool config docs Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 3/5] mergetool: add per-tool support for the autoMerge flag Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 4/5] mergetool: break setup_tool out into separate initialization function Seth House
2020-12-29  8:50           ` Johannes Sixt
2020-12-29 17:23             ` Seth House
2020-12-28 19:29         ` [PATCH v9 5/5] mergetool: add automerge_enabled tool-specific override function Seth House
2020-12-29  2:01           ` Felipe Contreras
2021-01-06  5:55           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-07  3:58             ` Seth House
2021-01-07  6:38               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-07  9:27                 ` Seth House
2021-01-07 21:26                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-08 15:04                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-30  5:46         ` [PATCH v10 0/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration (was automerge) Seth House
2021-01-30  5:46           ` [PATCH v10 1/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration Seth House
2021-01-30  8:08             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-30  5:46           ` [PATCH v10 2/3] mergetool: break setup_tool out into separate initialization function Seth House
2021-01-30  5:46           ` [PATCH v10 3/3] mergetool: add per-tool support and overrides for the hideResolved flag Seth House
2021-01-30  8:08             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-09 20:07           ` [PATCH v11 0/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration (was automerge) Seth House
2021-02-09 20:07             ` [PATCH v11 1/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration Seth House
2021-03-09  2:29               ` [PATCH] mergetool: do not enable hideResolved by default Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-09  5:42                 ` Seth House
2021-03-10  1:23                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-10  8:06                 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-03-11  1:57                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-12 23:12                     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-12 23:29                       ` Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-12 23:36                         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-13  8:36                           ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-13  8:38                             ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-13  8:41                             ` [PATCH 2/2] doc: describe mergetool configuration in git-mergetool(1) Jonathan Nieder
2021-03-13 23:34                               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-13 23:37                               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-09 20:07             ` [PATCH v11 2/3] mergetool: break setup_tool out into separate initialization function Seth House
2021-02-09 20:07             ` [PATCH v11 3/3] mergetool: add per-tool support and overrides for the hideResolved flag Seth House
2021-02-09 22:11             ` [PATCH v11 0/3] mergetool: add hideResolved configuration (was automerge) Junio C Hamano
2021-02-09 23:27               ` Seth House
2020-12-28 10:29     ` [PATCH v7 0/2] mergetool: add automerge configuration Junio C Hamano
2020-12-28 14:40       ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-28  1:02   ` [PATCH v6 0/1] " Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqmtvbjuvl.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dahlstrom@google.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=seth@eseth.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] mergetool: do not enable hideResolved by default' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).