From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B19C47080 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 19:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56993613AD for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 19:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234638AbhFATgg (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 15:36:36 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60015 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233397AbhFATgf (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 15:36:35 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110ADC65EA; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 15:34:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=mfvhyU5gX6Pqg+y/3wgyj2LmH8A3VZaOYcTPoQRBsME=; b=Mo/1 HgQUWkM5Z5MvR8zxq58GO8qKuazLg/LP+YoQTPImTdJqHcAW+j5CGWQKXNCUsUot TMqBJX7OqCAWx+s7CuEtOUWuBDyIBTDU2rYo63aAuJdeHHw/PHjIShy7saWOSotK 2p0+zuYFKfAPk51i8x4nvqWDUAD82uzNIRKPkC0= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068D9C65E9; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 15:34:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.73.10.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84360C65E8; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 15:34:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Felipe Contreras Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren , Mathias Kunter , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Jeff King , =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe , Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] doc: push: explain default=simple correctly References: <20210529071115.1908310-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20210529071115.1908310-7-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <60b49a3ae829b_24d28208fd@natae.notmuch> <60b62420858c4_e409520828@natae.notmuch> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 04:34:51 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6FAFC82A-C310-11EB-8F77-8B3BC6D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Felipe Contreras writes: > Therefore your proposal: > > If you are pushing to the same repository you pull from (which is > typically `origin`), then you need to ... > > is actually better, I just had to remind myself that centralized and > same repo are not the same thing. Yes, that is exactly why I brought up >> as it would avoid "the project is not centralized, but I push to my >> own repository and pull from it---what should I do?" questions. as a reason why we want to phrase it that way, so we are on the same page ;-)