From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22FFC7619D for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AE1208C4 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="wCZMSH+o" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727858AbgBSWdr (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:33:47 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:57900 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727082AbgBSWdr (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:33:47 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505A7493E4; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:33:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=igQQ/dJBmkUskJ+uCTE+e9OlU8o=; b=wCZMSH +ou4kukevqImdi9dFZJFfbSM8TFSibDp0eWib5J1GNIC7wMv/cM+TRwM7HmFntP+ wxIo6FdtnhgJ6nUl9H3u71WKYexgwxxdwIxwISt9tTMOaBCe1yHEtf9rR9M3FTAE AbuiN4+Qoeg/WUqpIuQD2nn/6CA8pHm3fIhtU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=fI5nbgipn+78u5Tr82RyGpviRxKJ1RKU +VyVKK+PtcLQv1Yi5+wVLzMYEXREkIZpkAkshAJ02k5wkvcKSFuzgF7aQoF1FMtg VVLI6ofSZuRJv5Wo4H11JBQHN4aYCURxdGQKqEMYYowICe9P5iJrUostHrZzVxJA T8cbgz5EiVk= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CA8493E2; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:33:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5641E493DE; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:33:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Emily Shaffer Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/15] bugreport: add git-remote-https version References: <20200214015343.201946-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20200214015343.201946-8-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20200219222807.GB26221@google.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:33:42 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200219222807.GB26221@google.com> (Emily Shaffer's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:28:07 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E26C7DD2-5367-11EA-A032-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Emily Shaffer writes: >> Also, in keeping with the existing code, we would need to use >> `--build-options` here (this is what `git version` calls the equivalent >> mode). >> >> _However_. >> >> I like your `--build-info` a lot more than `--build-options` (because the >> latter is very misleading: the commit and the date of the build are not >> "options" at all). > > Sure. Thanks for saying so. I don't think anybody would mind introducing --build-info to "git version" as a synonym and deprecate --build-options from it ;-)