git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Derrick Stolee" <derrickstolee@github.com>,
	"Johannes Schindelin" <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2022, #07; Wed, 25)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 16:10:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr14fx54f.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b57f907-3db1-9fe1-d582-e2d05acbe5ce@github.com> (Victoria Dye's message of "Thu, 26 May 2022 11:30:49 -0700")

Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com> writes:

>> If that is the case, then I am OK to merge this to 'next' to cast it
>> in stone, and then the let "rebuild the base" part once die, to be
>> reborn as many "tweak the way things work to (clarify|optimize) X"
>> follow-up topics.
>> 
> I'm not sure 'ab/ci-setup-simplify' would need to "die", more that it would
> be adjusted to rebase on top of an updated 'next' (including
> 'js/ci-github-workflow-markup').

Yeah, that is much closer to what I meant to say.  The one that
wants to build directly on top of 'master' would need to be retired,
because Dscho's series makes quite a lot of overlapping changes, and
it no longer would be "GitHub workflow is built on top of this
rearchitected foundation" anymore.

> That said, a re-sent version focusing on
> its own optimizations/improvements (rather than a comparisons against an IMO
> largely unrelated series) would almost certainly benefit both the series and
> its readers.

Thanks.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-26  8:41 What's cooking in git.git (May 2022, #07; Wed, 25) Junio C Hamano
2022-05-26 16:02 ` Victoria Dye
2022-05-26 17:23   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-26 18:02     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-26 18:30     ` Victoria Dye
2022-05-26 18:40       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-26 23:10       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-05-26 18:08 ` tb/cruft-packs (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2022, #07; Wed, 25)) Taylor Blau
2022-05-26 18:10 ` What's cooking in git.git (May 2022, #07; Wed, 25) Taylor Blau
2022-05-26 20:17   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-26 18:11 ` tb/midx-race-in-pack-objects (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2022, #07; Wed, 25)) Taylor Blau
2022-05-26 18:49 ` sg/build-gitweb (was: " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-26 19:06   ` sg/build-gitweb Junio C Hamano
2022-05-26 18:51 ` jc/http-clear-finished-pointer (was: What's cooking in git.git (May 2022, #07; Wed, 25)) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-26 19:37   ` Re* jc/http-clear-finished-pointer Junio C Hamano
2022-05-27 20:41     ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-27 21:35       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-01  7:26     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-06-01 15:48       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-26 18:54 ` js/bisect-in-c (was: What's cooking in git.git (May 2022, #07; Wed, 25)) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-26 19:38   ` js/bisect-in-c Junio C Hamano
2022-05-26 20:00     ` js/bisect-in-c Junio C Hamano
2022-05-27 12:52       ` js/bisect-in-c Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-26 18:57 ` jx/l10n-workflow-change (was: What's cooking in git.git (May 2022, #07; Wed, 25)) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqr14fx54f.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=vdye@github.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).