From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28990C433DB for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 18:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D651364E59 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 18:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230469AbhBFSty (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Feb 2021 13:49:54 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:63726 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230208AbhBFStx (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Feb 2021 13:49:53 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0367410B263; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 13:49:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+NGyCorkGELisEE5+X0E7hVN/zU=; b=B/AJQ3 aFOUjbaF72ZgxR2NeiEGlvNiu0iYTPkNa+co79SjLHvlviZdUTCUsSoNYJAr0JgY bHrUb9t0KA+pWSOSeEJusq3WasEba2o+7hVwxn/VFpUBkHE80s7hgdUUXNzSN5hH G0kwuloH8SVjzTIWQsK9sToIA8FrVGAIX1ReU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LTkyAueJOjp9RDr8nxNtyYRJuNia+9XG l7ip5X1bS7zXviMhMgGNpwjaOu+tquEGpUWeK2HhJSYdWF1UU85VGpzpI/qcDVTl l9bGd7k0+ldMcJ85Vb0nawlQhtuVLRe5n3LRPTLqcksX7AjWm3PoKLMokWVVVK2s 6rwvf9Xug1Y= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F034710B262; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 13:49:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43F5610B261; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 13:49:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [rfh] where is coccinelle these days on Ubuntu? References: Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 10:49:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:53:08 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FFA9B784-68AB-11EB-9172-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > From a quick search, it looks like coccinelle was moved to the > "universe" repository, at least in the Azure mirrors (which is what > GitHub Actions uses): > > http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/c/coccinelle/ Unfortunately the pool/ system does not tell us which suite a package is available in (that's the whole point of it, as it lets them share the packages across suites without moving things around). Looking for the package availability https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=coccinelle seems to tell me about these: xenial (16.04LTS) (devel): semantic patching tool for C [universe] 1.0.4.deb-2: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 powerpc ppc64el s390x bionic (18.04LTS) (devel): semantic patching tool for C [universe] 1.0.4.deb-3build4: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 ppc64el s390x groovy (20.10) (devel): semantic patching tool for C [universe] 1.0.8.deb-4: amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el s390x hirsute (devel): semantic patching tool for C [universe] 1.0.8.deb-5build1: amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el s390x but it does not seem to produce hits in any of the [focal], [focal-updates], and [focal-backports] suites, which the actions thing seem to be using X-<. Hmph...