Re: [PATCH] precious-files.txt: new document proposing new precious file type

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:

> There are
> precisely two choices in our design for how older Git versions can
> treat precious files:
>   * ignored-and-expendable
>   * untracked-and-precious
> If we pick syntax that causes older Git versions to treat precious
> files as ignored-and-expendable, we risk deleting important files.

Yes but not really.  I'd expect the adoption of precious feature and
the adoption of versions of Git that supports that feature will go
more or less hand in hand.  Projects that, for any reason, need to
keep their participants at pre-precious versions of Git would
naturally refrain from marking the "precious" paths in their "ignore"
mechanism before their participants are ready, so even if we chose
syntax that will make the precious ones mistaken as merely ignored,
the damage would be fairly small.