From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9BBC4338F for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 04:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720D1611C4 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 04:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229816AbhHUEWP (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Aug 2021 00:22:15 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:62241 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229657AbhHUEWO (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Aug 2021 00:22:14 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9BC131C38; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 00:21:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ZbwB1Jb+XAbAddupY2NSXzbpFj3cGK0PaiXAWo oYcbM=; b=ul+mB1x8l/y3nuBf71TlVgLJiI+WmgnaB4M+9bEQnR5ArKdHvot0Q5 Dwba3ZzHF+bdij4RfVh8Uu0z/Y4NP3AzGYEW7MwxS7ZYMqiZ+8TqUUEe8q2BmYFC 8Oonz+/QXEztMVr4tIDgL0R7VjexBcBZhLyN1KaO4rCHykl/FJ3J8= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57E6131C37; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 00:21:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.116.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89317131C36; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 00:21:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Xiaowen Xia Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, worldhello.net@gmail.com, Xia XiaoWen Subject: Re: [PATCH] add http.maxReceiveSpeed to limit git-receive-pack receiving speed References: <20210819091433.348-1-chenan.xxw@alibaba-inc.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 21:21:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Xiaowen Xia's message of "Sat, 21 Aug 2021 11:19:00 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 43370766-0237-11EC-93D2-D5C30F5B5667-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Xiaowen Xia writes: > But this patch is similar to the `http.lowspeedlimit` and `http.lowspeedtime`. > And `http.lowspeedlimit` will not error out the negative values: An earlier mistake by others does not make it OK to make the same mistake knowingly, though.