From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E44C2D0E4 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 21:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BC9206D9 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 21:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="LKxJx/AY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729631AbgKWV2l (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:28:41 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:55225 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727725AbgKWV2k (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:28:40 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40B28D010; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:28:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=PNR4B3rW9pDUfojmt1whu7QeeWM=; b=LKxJx/ AYjuFFydollWO124+dSWeDHN2fLwK45aGaYQ0mZPrswjTNM7/D6aCrIu8e8G5YBk ODD7X+ap2mgGn8rer0fuh9f+8ESdxWoe0EgDF7xoAMffwdjfcaFXnsQ7xoS8OB+P BJ1jW3xiNPjfp7Q46WU2Yrx2Dhg3os0BzynGw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SwVfuIG9BhKG4+lpz+tSrKbMFKkfetno lw82kDxiyjNFzOg+J5X3WZQ91h1Xx5qUQb3j9UTZYP8Y4FoTJf8vSfIjm4yfW1Dp 3bpJ2BzZn+my6euTQScGPBTMBPpIxURgJI4RjdrDFPLhw4T5JUrvRN0AGSeUtSj8 0YCHua/TIF4= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC64D8D00F; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:28:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B1EC8D00D; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:28:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] init: provide useful advice about init.defaultBranch References: <253d6706e6ab97e71ec012f6de33c75f3e980701.1606087406.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:28:36 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 23 Nov 2020 21:46:09 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D91D25EC-2DD2-11EB-8CE1-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hmm. I would like to believe that readers understand that setting it to > _any_ name would suppress this warning. Yes, and the point raised in an earlier messages was that it is not clear that there is no recourse for those who do NOT want to choose but still want to suppress. > It really is much better to make `git branch -m ` work in this > scenario. Yes, if we can make it work, that is much more preferred.