From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E28C433E2 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98A52080C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="VgEa01lt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726401AbgIPWRw (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:17:52 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59083 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726280AbgIPWRr (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:17:47 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDB87F496; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:20:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=GRea4R9pws/zUR37iq4Fw1/mvw0=; b=VgEa01 ltGXuffpGtPPt2RP6TH/EPr70ypVGPxuIdiBJYr8W9UEw3AJEcWOUI+zcDhPCTts +sI5+T356t4SV37fPOZFgp1wkn269YoN+4YgDSIv0bMqqUBenEMCvsgZIXxa9MT6 BR1KhOWTETe2TQiZ5AjccxOS1qufPIWAD28Nc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=IBPnvdtnvHRqspQH4T0vdkgszAfTO8vD l4iGrbQ7JRpAjtbKlq1FT9Yj0k3Zru/rYuqiRZoRJzxiv4YkxEPBdd+umBDnL2kr l9hyK1uRbvt3QH6Vkpqy8FEWs1Bujx1cGIIKeI0EjF9ScscpnOqjDVgwnyCe/V6n HcC3OSVG2Ig= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930B67F495; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:20:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1863A7F494; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:20:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Alex Riesen , git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Wong Subject: Re: sub-fetches discard --ipv4|6 option References: <20200914121906.GD4705@pflmari> <20200914194951.GA2819729@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200915115025.GA18984@pflmari> <20200915130506.GA2839276@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200915140613.GB18984@pflmari> <20200915152730.GA2853972@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200915212338.GA2868700@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200916163427.GB17726@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:20:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200916163427.GB17726@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:34:27 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 762A03EC-F862-11EA-AA2C-01D9BED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > That said, it sounds from the other part of the thread like we'll need > better parse-options support anyway, so this "noop flag bit" idea > probably isn't a good direction anyway. OK. Thanks.