From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E5AC433DF for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD2820C09 for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="L9+04Dkd" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731344AbgE0RSr (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:47 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:56191 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730085AbgE0RSp (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:45 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B896C4DD12; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Jfy7IVu/eXKHQllAnRfB+XbfVsY=; b=L9+04D kd3vTURlazVa6s5IdkMte2L0bcUgzjXUI+dlRAQpMbqStY+uaEsXd5JcLmDPLEyo 3db036OBqUITyg+Oy/1msMhkzIHXvhRGjUIOC9yN7V7LVgYVmGejcL6nBXgl8H/o LSAGim6id033buWQ5FTUEwdnLZMKTqReZCPmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wFcg31qbrlUkbTMyd/Jxv63lHe7wICd6 JludX6ohfbqcRc7ObtniNOSBcuMOnzn/U5g4bBdztTSKoxlxi33TgtTu5XfxY/zY KjQDWqNxf82oN9Mnlp1rG4M4M1rerkDgK0o3kusdKasSUDqZ7S5yVFRPKJ1cX1br 90F9HOOBl2g= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14FB4DD11; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.231.104.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3908B4DD10; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Kenneth Lorber Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] doc: Tell the glossary about core.hooksPath References: <1589681624-36969-1-git-send-email-keni@hers.com> <20200525232727.21096-1-keni@his.com> <20200525232727.21096-2-keni@his.com> <79C90EFA-CF65-4AF7-82B2-0B1B6FABA0F8@his.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 10:18:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <79C90EFA-CF65-4AF7-82B2-0B1B6FABA0F8@his.com> (Kenneth Lorber's message of "Wed, 27 May 2020 12:52:25 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1E26887C-A03E-11EA-8CAB-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Kenneth Lorber writes: >> I am not sure if .sample scripts should be a topioc of this glossary >> entry at all to begin with. And I think it outlived the usefulness >> to describe what was in versions of Git that is more than 10 years >> old. I wonder if it is a better idea to take your new description, >> but remove everything after "The sample scripts are enabled..." >> except for the "see ... for details" link? > > I had considered it but didn't want to presume. If I don't hear any objections > I will take it out. If it is not too much trouble, it probably is a better organization to make this a two-patch series, whose first patch leaves the original description on .sample files in, and the second patch that builds on top of the first patch removes the description on .sample files. That way, if people still likes to see the description on .sample, we can just drop the second patch and still use the first patch. Thanks.