From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C0EC433EF for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C11610F8 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345796AbhIGSYD (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:24:03 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:60797 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245718AbhIGSYC (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:24:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A255315F5C5; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:22:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=9pJN6aApbji6 lCHK2gJC/Fn3t/C/7ZOBZbIs31YAzqo=; b=TJhVMvtSExkq3gsRO/sS9Ypf4G7D 3B8tmS+BpTEONZqWV5n3HG6uigagkF52RwhCSYMQoleG2StC0o61f7Q1UeU7oGCC pFTjjieEuKhYJennAx5sCyamWvstcrNtOX0SQyhBHv2hJcB1qZGDOYnwxK8O4v72 pWWgw4dOVeQEUxU= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D9715F5C4; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:22:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.172.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDD4715F5C0; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:22:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Andrzej Hunt , =?utf-8?B?TMOpbmHDr2M=?= Huard , Derrick Stolee , Felipe Contreras , SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh , Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] add a test mode for SANITIZE=leak, run it in CI References: Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 11:22:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 7 Sep 2021 12:44:40 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9CCA9B38-1008-11EC-B875-F327CE9DA9D6-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 05:33:28PM +0200, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 = Bjarmason wrote: > > OK, I think we should proceed with this series/approach, then. The > question of friction when CI fails is an open one, but we won't know > until we have more data. So let's see what happens. :) > > The patches themselves look fine to me, though I had a few nits on the > third commit message. Thank you all. Let's see a copy-edited v5 and we can go from there.