From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA2EC4708F for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 04:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AB9611AC for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 04:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229877AbhEaEGh (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2021 00:06:37 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:50495 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229475AbhEaEGf (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2021 00:06:35 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6834812BD7C; Mon, 31 May 2021 00:04:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=5IRuP1n3l6GUZihSDkrm3EM/EY5ibdLBnYgEddnGH0U=; b=O3nV gEm06+dtfHWlTiqU61LNgxhc/mW+rLBUlh/ooLijcTB/VOeYYloZxMK4uqaYB59d jwelrtfeBqAjto6IPft28pXwt6dJyZoNdnGv7NoVgWKyIqraLuMBkUA8BTBChLaH 98jnF/HM1G/V47vOPozxVHTja/erZRWb5Opf5TM= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFAB12BD7B; Mon, 31 May 2021 00:04:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.73.10.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABD7812BD7A; Mon, 31 May 2021 00:04:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder , Hariom Verma , Karthik Nayak , Felipe Contreras , Bagas Sanjaya , Jeff King , Phillip Wood , ZheNing Hu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom References: Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 13:04:51 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5A92E630-C1C5-11EB-AF2D-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" writes: > @@ -530,6 +545,7 @@ static struct { > { "body", SOURCE_OBJ, FIELD_STR, body_atom_parser }, > { "trailers", SOURCE_OBJ, FIELD_STR, trailers_atom_parser }, > { "contents", SOURCE_OBJ, FIELD_STR, contents_atom_parser }, > + { "raw", SOURCE_OBJ, FIELD_STR, raw_atom_parser }, > { "upstream", SOURCE_NONE, FIELD_STR, remote_ref_atom_parser }, > { "push", SOURCE_NONE, FIELD_STR, remote_ref_atom_parser }, > { "symref", SOURCE_NONE, FIELD_STR, refname_atom_parser }, Doesn't this conflict with your own zh/ref-filter-atom-type topic? Shouldn't one build on top of the other? Or did we find something fundamentally broken about the other topic to make us retract it that I do not remember? Thanks.