From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2A6C433E0 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 22:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8708860230 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 22:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241972AbhCAWW7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:22:59 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64862 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239909AbhCAWUR (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:20:17 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6879BAD118; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:19:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=HaheigCSlGdgZJDjh1h9j3ZeaX0=; b=qeNlKZ FJ/7YePTE4DMEG8IJLVTD/rzy5i3+Q3o4Rt4tK7lFV0wNk9sdA2rOYdbN3xF9qQo v3srAXl0anyyHqTmi2dRvNQ2in5c0g30FTAUb9SiY73LahLd25Zi4odq8gkR06HS kGiDPGHaoL2F+yk2XG++uPRyCynUWviNEcleU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=E+WOSpTXDOMN3u8A4rdkXrarNjXo3RUz cAPE4qVP/16slJ4HhiicrsXt1GWbJpeLpzeUW+WlhtkjjmjwX8MjtNMBsaHHYaep uiwp/zYAIvqxx2Lha8tcuWu4e4L9W2RKMUyIi5QslKwLAQ2ivOD71EteWHn+hZW7 5lKqG9TK/rA= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F908AD117; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:19:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8A3DAD114; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:19:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Emily Shaffer Cc: Josh Steadmon , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , James Ramsay , Jonathan Nieder , "brian m. carlson" , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Phillip Wood , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] propose config-based hooks (part I) References: <20201205014607.1464119-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20201222000220.1491091-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:19:31 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Emily Shaffer's message of "Mon, 1 Mar 2021 13:51:31 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 323B00DA-7ADC-11EB-9019-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Emily Shaffer writes: >> I said this on Feb 17th, but since then I think I saw you answer >> "I'll do that" in responses to JTan's reviews in the past few days >> (e.g. ). Would I regret if I merge the >> topic down to 'next' today? > > Bah, I'm sorry I missed this - I had a broken mutt config and wasn't > seeing replies, my own fault. Argh. > > I have some pretty significant changes from JTan's reviews, so I'd > prefer if you would wait since it would be tricky to turn them into a > patch commit now. But if you'd rather merge it and see a patch instead, > that is fine with me. OK, I still have it outside 'next', I think.