From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0248C433E0 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 05:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F94264E37 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 05:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229564AbhBGFT5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2021 00:19:57 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:58272 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229445AbhBGFT4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2021 00:19:56 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C04A1FF4; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 00:19:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Ll+sp2uwzWno9fAPNLGYRqwk8pE=; b=KMvBQp qivvlDg8axcmnG2SvZyaCjDVsjeMSep4N4lAsHMbqPFObn6LbQlI5trYzM4d8uhj KNNu4xaxmKXzUM/sdgh/VoeI0MPu7wd0pGzxr29gpX2S/Z/rD/OlthTEOkzWnfU1 VlV8Lp4nx2rJiGeLFYGQ31I6iRancKy8XZTE8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nmQG3XeF/bxrIUMw1ATbCSO87uWqZ3Ml TamONvpXDkekOD9Et6hiSvV99b50RtGx9AAZXYc/HnbIFS/KD20JsBXGP5POBeXp O0KvDlfKDwQ0bsz7hYx60Ggx/Q8ugUq1kotyHKp7FYK6luUEMvKHhjJla4hA9SXb yFhW2LlzZTk= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC80A1FF3; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 00:19:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75CE3A1FF2; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 00:19:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , Jonathan Tan , Taylor Blau , Jeff King , Elijah Newren Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Optimization batch 7: use file basenames to guide rename detection References: Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 21:19:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget's message of "Sat, 06 Feb 2021 22:52:14 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0421FC56-6904-11EB-AF2A-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" writes: > This series depends on ort-perf-batch-6[1], which has not yet appeared in > seen despite being reviewed by both Junio and Stolee. It is because that one depends on something not in, but soon about to go in, 'master' and I didn't want to add to "this topic depends on top of that other topic" mess.