From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE0BC4363A for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA62E20725 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="aC3v0K7C" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726529AbgJ2Ruc (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:50:32 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:60124 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726090AbgJ2Rub (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:50:31 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33CE101EA3; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:50:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=2nxgbxBzUXfY 4Ais+5jEZk+zM/4=; b=aC3v0K7CcoAf+B2VwPKbxRQmXxfme5OPe8unz/cWHN51 6BVuhdTphbYvk2Use8e8T8HUE2/pTYH6M4SQVzcZ8/VoaYYuCGxctZ2K+DCILwcm e9981s3j2WQjDhqZZgaWBmdrYndBaVZmWPcExdG0xe06m5+S8M9j+6zcY/j5D8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Rf5QjH 78NaR+qCZqZY7oe1Z5b909EsmKxwbhCLq4HquXQFFV9K0EQUQw+0u6JyXdQtywK0 zDNHFofCpHoLyGcRaRL15h/JYICjx5vdEg+XKE2tEV67J3t1Mv7c1YY0yU7flF8L ULnsHyAPttC2jC92cW48jTchzrtdbyASlU7TA= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BACC101EA2; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:50:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E57DC101E9E; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:50:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Felipe Contreras Cc: =?utf-8?B?0JvRkdGI0LAg0J7Qs9C+0L3RjNC60L7Qsg==?= , Stefan Haller , Alexey via GitGitGadget , Git Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix zsh installation instructions References: Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:50:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Felipe Contreras's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:45:00 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3A47DF42-1A0F-11EB-83A9-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Felipe Contreras writes: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 2:00 PM Junio C Hamano wrot= e: >> >> =D0=9B=D1=91=D1=88=D0=B0 =D0=9E=D0=B3=D0=BE=D0=BD=D1=8C=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0= =B2 writes: > >> So,... even though it may look to more experienced zsh users that it >> is unnecessary to document it in this file, in your opinion, it is a >> good idea to mention "compinit" to help less experienced users? > > The first time you run zsh you are greeted with a configuration dialog > that includes this question: Ahh, yes, that reminds me why I gave up trying it out the last time. The large dialog asking my permission to contaminate ~/.* was simply too scary and distasteful for a "dip my toe in the water" sightseer. > If you don't turn on completion, the completion doesn't work for *any* = command. > > I think most users would understand why git completion doesn't work if > completion doesn't work for any command. OK, that sort of makes sense. > I would rather leave it out. Makes sense. Instead of adjusting my rerere database for that, ejecting lo/zsh-completion topic would be easier---what the other half of that patch does is already in your 29-patch series. Thanks.