git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Cc: workingjubilee@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org,
	christian.couder@gmail.com, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] Implement rev-list --bisect* --first-parent
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 11:42:52 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtv7hvi6r.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191105230403.5542-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (Jonathan Tan's message of "Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:04:03 -0800")

Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:

> Your commit message title should be of the form "<component>: <change>",
> e.g.:
>
>   rev-list: support --first-parent with --bisect*

Good suggestion.

> I would be much more laconic (in particular, omitting subjective terms
> like "minutiae" and "mountains of irrelevant data"), but perhaps that is
> just a matter of subjective style.

FWIW, I had the same reaction.  That part of the message was too
noisy without adding much actual value.

>> Note, bisecting on --first-parent becomes part of findall's previously
>> existing pass-through as an "option state" flag.
>
> I don't understand this part.

Me neither.

> Also, clarify in the commit message somewhere that this commit does not
> change the behavior of "git bisect".

s/\.$/ when used without the "--first-parent" option&/; you mean?

> As for the diff, besides my comments below, a change in the user-facing
> documentation of "rev-list" is needed, since --bisect and --first-parent
> now work together.

True.  I too am, like you are, happy to see that these two options
made to work well together.

Thanks, both, for the patch and useful comments.  My own review on
it may take a bit more time.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05  5:21 [Outreachy] [PATCH v7 0/1] Revenge of --bisect --first-parent workingjubilee
2019-11-05  5:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/1] Implement rev-list --bisect* --first-parent workingjubilee
2019-11-05 23:04   ` Jonathan Tan
2019-11-06  2:42     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-11-06 11:30       ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-11-06 21:36       ` Jonathan Tan
2019-11-07  3:35         ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-07  5:07         ` Jubilee Young
2019-11-07 16:00     ` Jubilee Young
2019-11-07 18:56       ` Jonathan Tan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqtv7hvi6r.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=workingjubilee@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] Implement rev-list --bisect* --first-parent' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).