From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] t2018: cleanup in current test
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:50:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtvelv5t0.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cTdJv9-M+zmp+Jo2bjOrkO3NgsguJ2xM+aXhf38OjjEEw@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Sunshine's message of "Thu, 25 Apr 2019 18:34:07 -0400")
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
>> test_expect_success 'checkout -b to a new branch, set to HEAD' '
>> + test_when_finished test_might_fail git branch -D branch2 &&
>> + test_when_finished git checkout branch1 &&
>
> I'm aware that when-finished actions fire in reverse order but the
> inherent subtlety of ordering of these two invocations still caught me
> off-guard for a moment since they are reverse the order in which one
> logically thinks about the actions which need to be performed. I
> wonder if it would be easier to digest if written like this:
>
> test_when_finished '
> git checkout branch1 &&
> test_might_fail git branch -D branch2
> ' &&
Perhaps. Be careful in choosing the quotes between sq and dq,
though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-25 21:10 [PATCH 0/3] checkout: allow -b/-B to work on a merge base Denton Liu
2019-04-25 21:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] t2018: cleanup in current test Denton Liu
2019-04-25 22:34 ` Eric Sunshine
2019-04-26 0:40 ` Denton Liu
2019-04-26 2:50 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-04-26 6:58 ` Eric Sunshine
2019-04-25 21:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] t2018: demonstrate checkout -b merge base bug Denton Liu
2019-04-25 21:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] checkout: allow -b/-B to work on a merge base Denton Liu
2019-04-26 3:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-26 4:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-26 19:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] allow checkout and branch to create branches " Denton Liu
2019-04-26 19:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] t2018: cleanup in current test Denton Liu
2019-04-26 19:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] t2018: demonstrate checkout -b merge base bug Denton Liu
2019-04-26 19:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] branch: make create_branch accept a merge base rev Denton Liu
2019-04-26 23:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] allow checkout and branch to create branches on a merge base Junio C Hamano
2019-04-26 23:40 ` Denton Liu
2019-04-26 23:52 ` Denton Liu
2019-04-27 0:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-27 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Denton Liu
2019-04-27 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] t2018: cleanup in current test Denton Liu
2019-04-27 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] branch: make create_branch accept a merge base rev Denton Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtvelv5t0.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liu.denton@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).