Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] send-email: various optimizations to speed up by >2x

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> I like all of this, except for the change in the interface of
> Git::config_regexp(). You mention that it's new-ish, and probably not in
> wide use. And I agree that's probably true. But it feels like violating
> a principle of not breaking APIs, and we should stick to that principle
> and not bend it for "well, it's not that old an API".
>
> I'd find it more compelling if it the existing interface was broken or
> hard to avoid changing. But couldn't we just add a new function with the
> extra info (config_regexp_with_values() or something)?

We seem to use it in-tree only once, but we have no control over
what out-of-tree users have been doing.

I do like your proposed name for the fact that it has _with_values
in it; the original gave us only a list of configuration variable
names, and now we are getting name-value tuples.

BUT

I am not sure if I like the new interface, and I do not know if the
the name "config_with_values" is a good match for what it does.

Namely, when a function is described as:

    =item config_regexp ( RE )

    Retrieve the list of configuration key names matching the regular
    expression C<RE>. The return value is an ARRAY of key-value pairs.

I would expect it to return ([key1, value1], [key2, value2], ...),
but the implementation returns (key1, value1, key2, value2, ...),
i.e. a flattened list, if I am not mistaken.

    my @cmd = ('config', '--null', '--get-regexp', $regex);
    unshift @cmd, $self if $self;
    my $data = command(@cmd);
    my (@kv) = map { split /\n/, $_, 2 } split /\0/, $data;
    return @kv;

We get NUL terminated records, so we first split the entire output
at NULs (to get a list of key-value records).  Each key-value record
has the key followed by LF followed by value, so we split it at the
first LF (i.e. a value with an embedded LF would behave correctly)
to extract key and value out of it.  But the resulting list is a
flat list with alternating key and value.

The side that works on the returned value of courese knows that it
is getting a flattened list and acts accordingly:

    my @kv = Git::config_regexp("^sende?mail[.]");
    while (my ($k, $v) = splice @kv, 0, 2) {
        push @{$known_config_keys{$k}} => $v;
    }

Perhaps it may be more performant than a more obvious and
straight-forward "list of tuples", i.e.

    return map { [split /\n/, $_, 2] } split /\0/, $data;

    my @kv = Git::config_regexp("^sende?mail[.]");
    for my $tuple (@kv) {
        push @{$known_config_keys{$tuple->[0]}}, $tuple->[1];
    }

but somehow the flattened list felt unnatural at least to a naïve
reader like me.