From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE3920133 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754133AbdCFSsx (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:48:53 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52911 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753436AbdCFSsv (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:48:51 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F596C16D; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:43:36 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=iw7xOaLKHF9muK71rXj/95BnfKk=; b=fV0vS3 mFVA0mM70j8hxu7PpgudLCkwmUYKNJrYAI4f7YBV/hWyZ3LDy4nuk4rqJOTQZJDp bcG7SXBmxOKzqdq+usHSGJCuarBQrTN8GJOx+niSyZXG7/ALYNJy9GVWOkjQ7jUE BJky2gqZDx6tkAHeGhsbgM9HcSLTEcuzlmS0Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=FpPhxkvtmvU4KvyVN4inGYVn1yqSaQcw l5t6I84iYRhNv5fBbbgWHsvKSVK+7glbQtqW/FpUaX0NIdccPsrLuOhok/8JdrJT y9XptzU7UMsI2068uQp2tvGpMgd+svdLGo2Zw7yq869usKZB3Yms9rs021BkJpLD YZlfDgShdhU= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193806C16C; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:43:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61CEB6C16B; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:43:35 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, sbeller@google.com, bmwill@google.com, jonathantanmy@google.com, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: RFC: Another proposed hash function transition plan References: <20170304011251.GA26789@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> <20170306084353.nrns455dvkdsfgo5@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:43:34 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20170306084353.nrns455dvkdsfgo5@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 6 Mar 2017 03:43:53 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CE24C1C8-029C-11E7-8E26-FC50AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: >> You can use the doc URL >> >> https://goo.gl/gh2Mzc > > I'd encourage anybody following along to follow that link. I almost > didn't, but there are a ton of comments there (I'm not sure how I feel > about splitting the discussion off the list, though). I am sure how I feel about it---we should really discourage it, unless it is an effort to help polishing an early draft for wider distribution and discussion. > I don't think we do this right now, but you can actually find the entry > (and exit) points of a pack during the index-pack step. Basically: We have code to do the "entry point" computation in index-pack already, I think, in 81a04b01 ("index-pack: --clone-bundle option", 2016-03-03). > I don't think using the "want"s as the entry points is unreasonable, > though. The server _shouldn't_ generally be sending us other cruft. That's true.