From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
Simon Pieters <simon@bocoup.com>,
Don Goodman-Wilson <don@goodman-wilson.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Virtual Inclusion Summit
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:48:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqwo4eedwc.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200610222719.GE148632@google.com> (Emily Shaffer's message of "Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:27:19 -0700")
Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> writes:
> One note I'd like to make is that the Git community already suffers from
> a lack of diversity; it will be hard for us to make meaningful changes
> if just those of us who already contribute attend, because many of us -
> myself included! - come from privilege and don't have much or any
> firsthand experience with microaggressions (or overt discrimination). I
> think it's a good idea to expand the attendance of this summit beyond
> the current contributor base and try to include more diverse voices and
> experts in building inclusive products.
>
> To that end, I'm going to see what kind of interested parties we can
> find to invite within Google - and I hope others will do the same within
> their own network. I think the risk of us coming up with meaningless
> changes far outweighs the risk of us having too many people in the Zoom
> call. :)
It is OK to have an optional meeting in the hope that a video
meeting may have a better chance to keep those who easily become too
aggressive and confrontational in text-only conversation in check
and instead have civilized conversation.
But I am not sure if it is a good idea to call such a meeting a
"Summit", given that there are those who prefer not to be seen,
heard or recorded how they appear and how they sound in a video
conference. They would not be able to join the conversation held in
such a "Summit" held only by those who are privileged enough to be
able to attend.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 22:27 Virtual Inclusion Summit (was: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)) Emily Shaffer
2020-06-10 22:48 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-06-11 1:10 ` Virtual Inclusion Summit Taylor Blau
2020-06-11 2:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-06-11 2:35 ` Taylor Blau
2020-06-11 8:58 ` Don Goodman-Wilson
2020-06-12 14:22 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-06-12 14:33 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-06-11 15:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-06-12 14:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqwo4eedwc.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=don@goodman-wilson.com \
--cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=simon@bocoup.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).